From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: lord@xfs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kenneth.w.chen@intel.com
Subject: Re: Limit hash table size
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 20:59:36 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040205205936.5f0e3be9.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040206053927.37709591.ak@suse.de>
Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 04 Feb 2004 22:06:42 -0600
> Steve Lord <lord@xfs.org> wrote:
>
>
> > It does look like 2.6 does better, but I don't have quite the
> > amount of memory on my laptop....
>
> I see the problem on a 8GB x86-64 box with 2.6.2-rc1.
I see no problem here. I see a kernel which is designed to address a mix
of workloads only being tested for one particular workload.
> After a find / I have:
>
> Active / Total Objects (% used) : 1794827 / 1804510 (99.5%)
> Active / Total Slabs (% used) : 125647 / 125647 (100.0%)
> Active / Total Caches (% used) : 71 / 112 (63.4%)
> Active / Total Size (% used) : 685008.27K / 686856.36K (99.7%)
> Minimum / Average / Maximum Object : 0.02K / 0.38K / 128.00K
>
> OBJS ACTIVE USE OBJ SIZE SLABS OBJ/SLAB CACHE SIZE NAME
> 708600 708559 99% 0.25K 47240 15 188960K dentry_cache
> 624734 624128 99% 0.69K 56794 11 454352K reiser_inode_cache
> 254200 253514 99% 0.09K 6355 40 25420K buffer_head
> 109327 109253 99% 0.06K 1853 59 7412K size-64
>
> Now I allocate 6GB of RAM. After that:
>
> Active / Total Objects (% used) : 741266 / 1092573 (67.8%)
> Active / Total Slabs (% used) : 78291 / 78291 (100.0%)
> Active / Total Caches (% used) : 71 / 112 (63.4%)
> Active / Total Size (% used) : 339837.24K / 455189.93K (74.7%)
> Minimum / Average / Maximum Object : 0.02K / 0.42K / 128.00K
>
> OBJS ACTIVE USE OBJ SIZE SLABS OBJ/SLAB CACHE SIZE NAME
> 464497 381126 82% 0.69K 42227 11 337816K reiser_inode_cache
> 391545 192481 49% 0.25K 26103 15 104412K dentry_cache
> 135840 95304 70% 0.09K 3396 40 13584K buffer_head
The caches were shrunk by around 40%. Looks good.
> 1GB of dentry cache seems to be quite excessive.
Not if your workload wants to use those dentries again. You've only
conducted one particular test.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-06 4:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <B05667366EE6204181EABE9C1B1C0EB5802441@scsmsx401.sc.intel.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <20040205155813.726041bd.akpm@osdl.org.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2004-02-06 1:54 ` Andi Kleen
2004-02-05 2:38 ` Steve Lord
2004-02-06 3:12 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-05 4:06 ` Steve Lord
2004-02-06 4:39 ` Andi Kleen
2004-02-06 4:59 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2004-02-06 5:34 ` Maneesh Soni
2004-02-06 3:19 ` Andi Kleen
2004-02-06 3:23 ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-06 3:34 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-06 3:38 ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-18 12:41 ` Pavel Machek
2004-02-06 3:09 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-06 3:18 ` Andi Kleen
2004-02-06 3:30 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-06 4:45 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-02-06 6:22 ` Matt Mackall
2004-02-06 20:20 ` Taneli Vähäkangas
2004-02-06 20:27 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-06 21:46 ` Taneli Vähäkangas
2004-02-18 0:45 Chen, Kenneth W
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-02-18 0:16 Chen, Kenneth W
2004-02-17 22:24 Chen, Kenneth W
2004-02-17 23:24 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-06 6:32 Manfred Spraul
2004-02-06 0:10 Chen, Kenneth W
2004-02-06 0:23 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-09 23:12 ` Jes Sorensen
2004-01-14 22:31 Chen, Kenneth W
2004-01-18 14:25 ` Anton Blanchard
2004-01-14 22:29 Chen, Kenneth W
2004-01-12 16:50 Manfred Spraul
2004-01-09 19:05 Chen, Kenneth W
2004-01-12 13:32 ` Anton Blanchard
2004-01-08 23:12 Chen, Kenneth W
2004-01-09 9:25 ` Andrew Morton
2004-01-09 14:25 ` Anton Blanchard
2004-02-05 23:58 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040205205936.5f0e3be9.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=kenneth.w.chen@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lord@xfs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®