mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maneesh Soni <maneesh@in.ibm.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Steve Lord <lord@xfs.org>,
	akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kenneth.w.chen@intel.com
Subject: Re: Limit hash table size
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 11:04:43 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040206053443.GB1263@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040206053927.37709591.ak@suse.de>

On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 04:49:01AM +0000, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Feb 2004 22:06:42 -0600
> Steve Lord <lord@xfs.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> > It does look like 2.6 does better, but I don't have quite the
> > amount of memory on my laptop....
> 
> I see the problem on a 8GB x86-64 box with 2.6.2-rc1. 
> 
> After a find / I have:
> 
>  Active / Total Objects (% used)    : 1794827 / 1804510 (99.5%)
>  Active / Total Slabs (% used)      : 125647 / 125647 (100.0%)
>  Active / Total Caches (% used)     : 71 / 112 (63.4%)
>  Active / Total Size (% used)       : 685008.27K / 686856.36K (99.7%)
>  Minimum / Average / Maximum Object : 0.02K / 0.38K / 128.00K
> 
>   OBJS ACTIVE  USE OBJ SIZE  SLABS OBJ/SLAB CACHE SIZE NAME                   
> 708600 708559  99%    0.25K  47240       15    188960K dentry_cache
> 624734 624128  99%    0.69K  56794       11    454352K reiser_inode_cache
> 254200 253514  99%    0.09K   6355       40     25420K buffer_head
> 109327 109253  99%    0.06K   1853       59      7412K size-64
> 
> Now I allocate 6GB of RAM. After that:
> 
>  Active / Total Objects (% used)    : 741266 / 1092573 (67.8%)
>  Active / Total Slabs (% used)      : 78291 / 78291 (100.0%)
>  Active / Total Caches (% used)     : 71 / 112 (63.4%)
>  Active / Total Size (% used)       : 339837.24K / 455189.93K (74.7%)
>  Minimum / Average / Maximum Object : 0.02K / 0.42K / 128.00K
> 
>   OBJS ACTIVE  USE OBJ SIZE  SLABS OBJ/SLAB CACHE SIZE NAME                   
> 464497 381126  82%    0.69K  42227       11    337816K reiser_inode_cache
> 391545 192481  49%    0.25K  26103       15    104412K dentry_cache
				                ^^^^^^^^^
> 135840  95304  70%    0.09K   3396       40     13584K buffer_head
> 
> 1GB of dentry cache seems to be quite excessive.
> 

Here dentry cache looks to be approximately 104 MB (104,412K) and not 1GB and 
it has reduced from 188 MB to 104 MB.

Maneesh

-- 
Maneesh Soni
Linux Technology Center, 
IBM Software Lab, Bangalore, India
email: maneesh@in.ibm.com
Phone: 91-80-5044999 Fax: 91-80-5268553
T/L : 9243696

  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-02-06  5:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <B05667366EE6204181EABE9C1B1C0EB5802441@scsmsx401.sc.intel.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
     [not found] ` <20040205155813.726041bd.akpm@osdl.org.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2004-02-06  1:54   ` Andi Kleen
2004-02-05  2:38     ` Steve Lord
2004-02-06  3:12       ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-05  4:06         ` Steve Lord
2004-02-06  4:39           ` Andi Kleen
2004-02-06  4:59             ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-06  5:34             ` Maneesh Soni [this message]
2004-02-06  3:19         ` Andi Kleen
2004-02-06  3:23         ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-06  3:34           ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-06  3:38             ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-18 12:41       ` Pavel Machek
2004-02-06  3:09     ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-06  3:18       ` Andi Kleen
2004-02-06  3:30         ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-06  4:45           ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-02-06  6:22       ` Matt Mackall
2004-02-06 20:20       ` Taneli Vähäkangas
2004-02-06 20:27         ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-06 21:46           ` Taneli Vähäkangas
2004-02-18  0:45 Chen, Kenneth W
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-02-18  0:16 Chen, Kenneth W
2004-02-17 22:24 Chen, Kenneth W
2004-02-17 23:24 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-06  6:32 Manfred Spraul
2004-02-06  0:10 Chen, Kenneth W
2004-02-06  0:23 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-09 23:12   ` Jes Sorensen
2004-01-14 22:31 Chen, Kenneth W
2004-01-18 14:25 ` Anton Blanchard
2004-01-14 22:29 Chen, Kenneth W
2004-01-12 16:50 Manfred Spraul
2004-01-09 19:05 Chen, Kenneth W
2004-01-12 13:32 ` Anton Blanchard
2004-01-08 23:12 Chen, Kenneth W
2004-01-09  9:25 ` Andrew Morton
2004-01-09 14:25 ` Anton Blanchard
2004-02-05 23:58 ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040206053443.GB1263@in.ibm.com \
    --to=maneesh@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=kenneth.w.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lord@xfs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®