* Re: Fw: Client looses NFS handle (kernel 2.6.3) [not found] <20040221214345.6533eb68.akpm@osdl.org> @ 2004-02-22 10:12 ` Trond Myklebust 2004-02-23 13:15 ` Willy Weisz 2004-02-23 22:28 ` Chris Wright 0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Trond Myklebust @ 2004-02-22 10:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Morton, Willy Weisz; +Cc: linux-kernel The "Can't bind to reserved port" error message looks like the known problem when you set CONFIG_SECURITY. It has been discussed several times already on l-k. Please either disable CONFIG_SECURITY (it's not as if *that* is going to be a showstopper when migrating to 2.6.x from 2.4.x) or go to my website and apply the advertised fix: http://www.fys.uio.no/~trondmy/src/Linux-2.6.x/2.6.3/linux-2.6.3-08-reconnect.dif Cheers, Trond På lau , 21/02/2004 klokka 21:43, skreiv Andrew Morton: > fyi.. > > Begin forwarded message: > > Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 00:36:13 +0100 > From: Willy Weisz <weisz@vcpc.univie.ac.at> > To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Client looses NFS handle (kernel 2.6.3) > > > The client looses the handle to a statically mounted NFS file system. A > user sees > a stale handle in "df" and can't access files and directories. > > When root issues a "df" or accesses a file or directory on the NFS file > system, > it gets a correct result. > > Thereafter a normal user also can access files and directories on the > NFS file system. > After a short time the NFS handle becomes stale again. > /var/log/messages contains the lines: > Feb 21 23:33:50 gsr108 kernel: RPC: Can't bind to reserved port (13). > Feb 21 23:33:50 gsr108 kernel: RPC: can't bind to reserved port. > after a user tries to access a file on the NFS file system. > The NFS server runs kernel version 2.4.23 SMP. Client NFS 2.4.23 works. > > The filesystem is mounted with the following options in /etc/fstab: > rw,bg,hard,intr,rsize=8192,wsize=8192 > > We are stuck and can't upgrade to 2.6.x with this bug. > > Regards > > Willy Weisz > ----------------------------------------------------------- > Willy Weisz > > European Centre for Parallel Computing at Vienna (VCPC) > Liechtensteinstrasse 22 > A-1090 Wien > Tel: (+43 1) 4277 - 38824 Fax: (+43 1) 4277 - 9388 > e-mail: weisz@vcpc.univie.ac.at > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Fw: Client looses NFS handle (kernel 2.6.3) 2004-02-22 10:12 ` Fw: Client looses NFS handle (kernel 2.6.3) Trond Myklebust @ 2004-02-23 13:15 ` Willy Weisz 2004-02-23 15:38 ` Trond Myklebust 2004-02-23 22:28 ` Chris Wright 1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Willy Weisz @ 2004-02-23 13:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Trond Myklebust; +Cc: Andrew Morton, linux-kernel, Kurt Rabitsch Dear Trond, thank you for the fast reply. I chose the first solution (unsetting CONFIG_SECURITY) as I don't have local security modules anyhow. and our problem disapeared. Is there any reason to nevertheless install your patch? Cheers Willy Trond Myklebust wrote: >The "Can't bind to reserved port" error message looks like the known >problem when you set CONFIG_SECURITY. It has been discussed several >times already on l-k. > >Please either disable CONFIG_SECURITY (it's not as if *that* is going to >be a showstopper when migrating to 2.6.x from 2.4.x) or go to my website >and apply the advertised fix: > >http://www.fys.uio.no/~trondmy/src/Linux-2.6.x/2.6.3/linux-2.6.3-08-reconnect.dif > >Cheers, > Trond > > >På lau , 21/02/2004 klokka 21:43, skreiv Andrew Morton: > > >>fyi.. >> >>Begin forwarded message: >> >>Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 00:36:13 +0100 >>From: Willy Weisz <weisz@vcpc.univie.ac.at> >>To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>Subject: Client looses NFS handle (kernel 2.6.3) >> >> >>The client looses the handle to a statically mounted NFS file system. A >>user sees >>a stale handle in "df" and can't access files and directories. >> >>When root issues a "df" or accesses a file or directory on the NFS file >>system, >>it gets a correct result. >> >>Thereafter a normal user also can access files and directories on the >>NFS file system. >>After a short time the NFS handle becomes stale again. >>/var/log/messages contains the lines: >>Feb 21 23:33:50 gsr108 kernel: RPC: Can't bind to reserved port (13). >>Feb 21 23:33:50 gsr108 kernel: RPC: can't bind to reserved port. >>after a user tries to access a file on the NFS file system. >>The NFS server runs kernel version 2.4.23 SMP. Client NFS 2.4.23 works. >> >>The filesystem is mounted with the following options in /etc/fstab: >>rw,bg,hard,intr,rsize=8192,wsize=8192 >> >>We are stuck and can't upgrade to 2.6.x with this bug. >> >>Regards >> >>Willy Weisz >>----------------------------------------------------------- >>Willy Weisz >> >>European Centre for Parallel Computing at Vienna (VCPC) >> Liechtensteinstrasse 22 >> A-1090 Wien >>Tel: (+43 1) 4277 - 38824 Fax: (+43 1) 4277 - 9388 >> e-mail: weisz@vcpc.univie.ac.at >> >>- >>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in >>the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >>More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >>Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ >> >> >> > > > > > -- ----------------------------------------------------------- Willy Weisz European Centre for Parallel Computing at Vienna (VCPC) Liechtensteinstrasse 22 A-1090 Wien Tel: (+43 1) 4277 - 38824 Fax: (+43 1) 4277 - 9388 e-mail: weisz@vcpc.univie.ac.at ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Fw: Client looses NFS handle (kernel 2.6.3) 2004-02-23 13:15 ` Willy Weisz @ 2004-02-23 15:38 ` Trond Myklebust 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Trond Myklebust @ 2004-02-23 15:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Willy Weisz; +Cc: Andrew Morton, linux-kernel, Kurt Rabitsch På må , 23/02/2004 klokka 05:15, skreiv Willy Weisz: > Dear Trond, > > thank you for the fast reply. I chose the first solution (unsetting > CONFIG_SECURITY) > as I don't have local security modules anyhow. and our problem disapeared. > > Is there any reason to nevertheless install your patch? No: the patch solves just the one problem. Cheers, Trond ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Fw: Client looses NFS handle (kernel 2.6.3) 2004-02-22 10:12 ` Fw: Client looses NFS handle (kernel 2.6.3) Trond Myklebust 2004-02-23 13:15 ` Willy Weisz @ 2004-02-23 22:28 ` Chris Wright 2004-02-24 1:27 ` Trond Myklebust 1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Chris Wright @ 2004-02-23 22:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Trond Myklebust; +Cc: Andrew Morton, Willy Weisz, linux-kernel * Trond Myklebust (trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no) wrote: > The "Can't bind to reserved port" error message looks like the known > problem when you set CONFIG_SECURITY. It has been discussed several > times already on l-k. > > Please either disable CONFIG_SECURITY (it's not as if *that* is going to > be a showstopper when migrating to 2.6.x from 2.4.x) or go to my website > and apply the advertised fix: > > http://www.fys.uio.no/~trondmy/src/Linux-2.6.x/2.6.3/linux-2.6.3-08-reconnect.dif Looks nice. Will this go upstream, or is there still other issue? thanks, -chris -- Linux Security Modules http://lsm.immunix.org http://lsm.bkbits.net ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Fw: Client looses NFS handle (kernel 2.6.3) 2004-02-23 22:28 ` Chris Wright @ 2004-02-24 1:27 ` Trond Myklebust 2004-02-24 1:42 ` Chris Wright 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Trond Myklebust @ 2004-02-24 1:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Chris Wright; +Cc: Andrew Morton, Willy Weisz, linux-kernel På må , 23/02/2004 klokka 14:28, skreiv Chris Wright: > > > > http://www.fys.uio.no/~trondmy/src/Linux-2.6.x/2.6.3/linux-2.6.3-08-reconnect.dif > > Looks nice. Will this go upstream, or is there still other issue? No known issues, so I expect it to go upstream RSN. I just thought it would be convenient to make use of the fact that the Connectathon inter-vendor testfest is on right now to give it some extra milage first ;-). Cheers, Trond ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Fw: Client looses NFS handle (kernel 2.6.3) 2004-02-24 1:27 ` Trond Myklebust @ 2004-02-24 1:42 ` Chris Wright 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Chris Wright @ 2004-02-24 1:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Trond Myklebust; +Cc: Andrew Morton, Willy Weisz, linux-kernel * Trond Myklebust (trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no) wrote: > På må , 23/02/2004 klokka 14:28, skreiv Chris Wright: > > > > > > http://www.fys.uio.no/~trondmy/src/Linux-2.6.x/2.6.3/linux-2.6.3-08-reconnect.dif > > > > Looks nice. Will this go upstream, or is there still other issue? > > No known issues, so I expect it to go upstream RSN. I just thought it > would be convenient to make use of the fact that the Connectathon > inter-vendor testfest is on right now to give it some extra milage first > ;-). Heh, sounds good. Thanks ;-) -chris -- Linux Security Modules http://lsm.immunix.org http://lsm.bkbits.net ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-02-24 1:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20040221214345.6533eb68.akpm@osdl.org>
2004-02-22 10:12 ` Fw: Client looses NFS handle (kernel 2.6.3) Trond Myklebust
2004-02-23 13:15 ` Willy Weisz
2004-02-23 15:38 ` Trond Myklebust
2004-02-23 22:28 ` Chris Wright
2004-02-24 1:27 ` Trond Myklebust
2004-02-24 1:42 ` Chris Wright
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®