* Re: [PATCH][RFC] highpmd for arch i386 PAE
[not found] <1082048738.8544.25.camel@hikaru.lan>
@ 2004-04-15 18:28 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-04-15 19:12 ` Antony Suter
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: William Lee Irwin III @ 2004-04-15 18:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Antony Suter; +Cc: List LKML
On Fri, Apr 16, 2004 at 03:05:38AM +1000, Antony Suter wrote:
> This patch places middle level pagetables into highmem, on PAE machines.
> It is relevant to arch/i386 machines running many processes on 4 to 64
> GB of RAM.
> This is simply a resync to the current kernel of a patch released by
> William Lee Irwin III about 4 months ago. WLI's comments on the patch
> are:
I'll be damned. This is one of the many pieces people never said much
about. Looks relatively thorough.
I did a few things to keep pmd caching around that look like they got
dropped, but I suppose for a standalone mainline port that's the only
option.
I'm really astounded ppl are going through the trouble of resurrecting
all this stuff. I suppose that means it was valuable to someone.
-- wli
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH][RFC] highpmd for arch i386 PAE
2004-04-15 18:28 ` [PATCH][RFC] highpmd for arch i386 PAE William Lee Irwin III
@ 2004-04-15 19:12 ` Antony Suter
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Antony Suter @ 2004-04-15 19:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: William Lee Irwin III; +Cc: List LKML
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1226 bytes --]
On Fri, 2004-04-16 at 04:28, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 16, 2004 at 03:05:38AM +1000, Antony Suter wrote:
> > This patch places middle level pagetables into highmem, on PAE machines.
> > It is relevant to arch/i386 machines running many processes on 4 to 64
> > GB of RAM.
> > This is simply a resync to the current kernel of a patch released by
> > William Lee Irwin III about 4 months ago. WLI's comments on the patch
> > are:
>
> I'll be damned. This is one of the many pieces people never said much
> about. Looks relatively thorough.
>
> I did a few things to keep pmd caching around that look like they got
> dropped, but I suppose for a standalone mainline port that's the only
> option.
Did you have a more recent version than the one from
linux-2.6.0-test11-wli-1.tar.bz2 ? Perhaps patch-2.6.0-test11-wli-3.bz2
included it, but you didn't break them out into a tarball?
> I'm really astounded ppl are going through the trouble of resurrecting
> all this stuff. I suppose that means it was valuable to someone.
Well i'm starting at number 01... :)
--
- Antony Suter (suterant users sourceforge net) "Bonta"
- "...through shadows falling, out of memory and time..."
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-04-15 19:13 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <1082048738.8544.25.camel@hikaru.lan>
2004-04-15 18:28 ` [PATCH][RFC] highpmd for arch i386 PAE William Lee Irwin III
2004-04-15 19:12 ` Antony Suter
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®