From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
To: "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@osdl.org>
Cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>,
jgarzik@pobox.com, akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PATCH] Kconfig.debug family
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 23:36:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040415213614.GB2656@mars.ravnborg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040415135229.75964100.rddunlap@osdl.org>
On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 01:52:29PM -0700, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 16:25:39 -0500 Matt Mackall wrote:
>
> | Sticking this in arch/*/Kconfig seems silly (as does much of the
> | duplication in said files). Can we stick this and other debug bits
> | under the kallsyms option in init/Kconfig instead? Or alternately move
> | debugging bits into their own file that gets included as appropriate.
>
>
> This patch:
> - creates lib/Kconfig.debug for generic kernel debug options
> - creates arch/*/Kconfig.debug for arch-specific debug options
> - moves KALLSYMS to the generic kernel debug options list
>
>
> This is a first cut for review/comments. I will double-check
> the generic options list to see how it needs to be corrected...
Looks good to me - and I really like concentrating this in
a more logic common place.
If you could move even more to the generic part it would be fine.
Sam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-15 21:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-14 7:43 [PATCH] conditionalize some boring buffer_head checks Jeff Garzik
2004-04-14 7:58 ` Andrew Morton
2004-04-14 8:02 ` Andrew Morton
2004-04-14 8:10 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-04-14 8:16 ` Andrew Morton
2004-04-14 8:45 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-04-14 9:10 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-04-14 21:25 ` Matt Mackall
2004-04-14 21:27 ` Randy.Dunlap
2004-04-14 21:37 ` Matt Mackall
2004-04-14 21:33 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-04-14 21:49 ` Matt Mackall
2004-04-15 6:12 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-04-15 20:52 ` PATCH] Kconfig.debug family Randy.Dunlap
2004-04-15 21:36 ` Sam Ravnborg [this message]
2004-04-15 21:36 ` Marc-Christian Petersen
2004-04-15 21:41 ` Randy.Dunlap
2004-04-14 8:27 ` [PATCH] conditionalize some boring buffer_head checks Tim Hockin
2004-04-14 8:48 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-04-14 13:31 ` Chris Friesen
2004-04-14 15:05 ` Randy.Dunlap
2004-04-14 8:29 ` Jens Axboe
2004-04-14 8:42 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-04-14 8:47 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040415213614.GB2656@mars.ravnborg.org \
--to=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=rddunlap@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®