From: Matthew Dharm <mdharm-kernel@one-eyed-alien.net>
To: Ken Ashcraft <ken@coverity.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [CHECKER] Implementation inconsistencies in 2.6.3
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 16:05:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040427230520.GB2662@one-eyed-alien.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4609.171.64.70.113.1083106713.spork@webmail.coverity.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2759 bytes --]
On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 03:58:33PM -0700, Ken Ashcraft wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 02:47:22PM -0700, Ken Ashcraft wrote:
> >
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------
> >> [BUG] (mdharm-usb@one-eyed-alien.net) looks like it should return count
> >> instead of strlen(buf), but this is in scsiglue.c, so is it special
> >> code?
> >>
> >> example:
> >> /home/kash/linux/2.6.3/linux-2.6.3/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c:274:store_rescan_field:
> >> NOTE:READ: Checking arg count [EXAMPLE=device_attribute.store-2]
> >>
> >> /home/kash/linux/2.6.3/linux-2.6.3/drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c:321:store_max_sectors:
> >> ERROR:READ: Not checking arg [COUNTER=device_attribute.store-2] [fit=1]
> >> [fit_fn=1] [fn_ex=0] [fn_counter=1] [ex=233] [counter=1] [z >
> >> 3.20943839741638] [fn-z = -4.35889894354067]
> >>
> >> return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", sdev->request_queue->max_sectors);
> >> }
> >>
> >> /* Input routine for the sysfs max_sectors file */
> >>
> >> Error --->
> >> static ssize_t store_max_sectors(struct device *dev, const char *buf,
> >> size_t count)
> >> {
> >> struct scsi_device *sdev = to_scsi_device(dev);
> >
> > My understanding was that I was supposed to return the number of bytes in
> > the buffer that I actually used. I thought 'count' was the maximum size I
> > could use.
> >
>
> That sounds feasible. I can't find any documentation on the interface, so
> I can't tell. However, there are ~233 functions that at least reference
> count. Many of them are almost identical: they call sscanf or strtol to
> get a length out of buf, pass that length to some subroutine, and then
> unconditionally return count. This is a more representative example than
> the one listed above.
>
> static ssize_t set_pwm_enable1(struct device *dev, const char *buf,
> size_t count)
> {
> struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev);
> struct asb100_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> unsigned long val = simple_strtoul(buf, NULL, 10);
> data->pwm &= 0x0f; /* keep the duty cycle bits */
> data->pwm |= (val ? 0x80 : 0x00);
> asb100_write_value(client, ASB100_REG_PWM1, data->pwm);
> return count;
> }
It seems pretty shady to me to have a function which is passed a value, the
entire purpose of which is to return it to the caller unchanged.
Perhaps someone on l-k can comment...
Matt
--
Matthew Dharm Home: mdharm-usb@one-eyed-alien.net
Maintainer, Linux USB Mass Storage Driver
Hey Chief. We've figured out how to save the technical department. We
need to be committed.
-- The Techs
User Friendly, 1/22/1998
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-27 23:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-27 21:47 Ken Ashcraft
2004-04-27 22:14 ` Matthew Dharm
2004-04-27 22:58 ` Ken Ashcraft
2004-04-27 23:05 ` Matthew Dharm [this message]
2004-04-28 0:13 ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-04-28 16:15 ` Krzysztof Halasa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040427230520.GB2662@one-eyed-alien.net \
--to=mdharm-kernel@one-eyed-alien.net \
--cc=ken@coverity.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®