From: "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@osdl.org>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl>
Cc: trini@kernel.crashing.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
akpm@osdl.org, jgarzik@pobox.com, mpm@selenic.com,
zwane@linuxpower.ca
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Kconfig.debug family (v3-bart)
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 13:52:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040429135241.4e46fd46.rddunlap@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200404292054.49663.bzolnier@elka.pw.edu.pl>
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 20:54:49 +0200 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
| On Thursday 29 of April 2004 18:51, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
| > On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 18:42:23 +0200 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
|
| > | Only on x86 it does a proper thing:
| > |
| > | arch/<arch>/Kconfig -> arch/<arch>/Kconfig.debug -> lib/Kconfig.debug
| >
| > That's because I goofed up... it's the wrong patch.
| >
| > I was trying something that someone suggested (You!) and it didn't
|
| :)
|
| > work out in a desirable way as far as how it's presented in
| > {x,menu}config, so I need to fix that (i386 part) and then you
|
| In your previous patch (vs 2.6.5) there was only one "Kernel hacking" menu,
| in this one there are two menus: "Kernel hacking" and "X86 kernel hacking".
|
| I hacked it quickly and I have one menu again (on x86 arch specific options
| are not configurable) so I also hacked+checked ppc and 'make menuconfig'
| looks OK). Did I miss something?
Bart's changes still look good. I've updated the entire patch
to use that model. It's available here:
http://developer.osdl.org/rddunlap/patches/kdebug1menu_266rc2_v3.patch
Any more comments before 2.6.6?
Thanks,
--
~Randy
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-29 21:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-22 3:51 [PATCH] Kconfig.debug family Randy.Dunlap
2004-04-22 3:59 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-04-22 4:07 ` Andrew Morton
2004-04-26 16:42 ` Tom Rini
2004-04-29 15:38 ` Randy.Dunlap
2004-04-29 15:50 ` Tom Rini
2004-04-29 16:42 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-04-29 16:51 ` Randy.Dunlap
2004-04-29 18:54 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-04-29 19:46 ` Randy.Dunlap
2004-04-29 20:52 ` Randy.Dunlap [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040429135241.4e46fd46.rddunlap@osdl.org \
--to=rddunlap@osdl.org \
--cc=B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=trini@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=zwane@linuxpower.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome