mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@osdl.org>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl>
Cc: trini@kernel.crashing.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	akpm@osdl.org, jgarzik@pobox.com, mpm@selenic.com,
	zwane@linuxpower.ca
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Kconfig.debug family (v3-bart)
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 13:52:41 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040429135241.4e46fd46.rddunlap@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200404292054.49663.bzolnier@elka.pw.edu.pl>

On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 20:54:49 +0200 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:

| On Thursday 29 of April 2004 18:51, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
| > On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 18:42:23 +0200 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
| 
| > | Only on x86 it does a proper thing:
| > |
| > | arch/<arch>/Kconfig -> arch/<arch>/Kconfig.debug -> lib/Kconfig.debug
| >
| > That's because I goofed up... it's the wrong patch.
| >
| > I was trying something that someone suggested (You!) and it didn't
| 
| :)
| 
| > work out in a desirable way as far as how it's presented in
| > {x,menu}config, so I need to fix that (i386 part) and then you
| 
| In your previous patch (vs 2.6.5) there was only one "Kernel hacking" menu,
| in this one there are two menus: "Kernel hacking" and "X86 kernel hacking".
| 
| I hacked it quickly and I have one menu again (on x86 arch specific options
| are not configurable) so I also hacked+checked  ppc and 'make menuconfig'
| looks OK).  Did I miss something?

Bart's changes still look good.  I've updated the entire patch
to use that model.  It's available here:
  http://developer.osdl.org/rddunlap/patches/kdebug1menu_266rc2_v3.patch


Any more comments before 2.6.6?

Thanks,
--
~Randy

      parent reply	other threads:[~2004-04-29 21:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-04-22  3:51 [PATCH] Kconfig.debug family Randy.Dunlap
2004-04-22  3:59 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-04-22  4:07 ` Andrew Morton
2004-04-26 16:42 ` Tom Rini
2004-04-29 15:38   ` Randy.Dunlap
2004-04-29 15:50     ` Tom Rini
2004-04-29 16:42     ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-04-29 16:51       ` Randy.Dunlap
2004-04-29 18:54         ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-04-29 19:46           ` Randy.Dunlap
2004-04-29 20:52           ` Randy.Dunlap [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040429135241.4e46fd46.rddunlap@osdl.org \
    --to=rddunlap@osdl.org \
    --cc=B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mpm@selenic.com \
    --cc=trini@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=zwane@linuxpower.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome