From: Jan Harkes <jaharkes@cs.cmu.edu>
To: "Jörn Engel" <joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de>
Cc: Steve French <smfltc@us.ibm.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT PATCH COW] proof of concept impementation of cowlinks
Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 10:08:53 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040511140853.GT24211@delft.aura.cs.cmu.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040511100232.GA31673@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de>
On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 12:02:32PM +0200, Jörn Engel wrote:
> > Copyfile can trivially be implemented in libc. I don't see why it would
> > have to be a system call. If a network filesystem wants to optimize the
> > file copying it could do this based on the sendfile data. If source and
> > destination are within the same filesystem and we're copying the whole
> > file starting at offset 0, send a copyfile RPC.
>
> Can you explain this to Steve? I'm still quite clueless about network
> filesystems, but it sounded as if such an optimization was impossible
> to do in cifs without a combined create/copy/unlink_on_error system
> call.
>
> If your suggestion works and the network filesystems can be changed to
> work independently of a struct file*, I agree with you that copyfile()
> is a stupid idea and should be forgotten.
I would probably do it by overriding the file_operations.sendfile
function. A first approximation of a possible implementation follows. I
went a bit crazy on the comments. The only problem is that the type of
target is unknown, block/loop.c and nfsd/vfs.c are using sendfile to
to send to something that is not a struct file.
Jan
int my_file_sendfile(struct file *in_file, loff_t *ppos, size_t count,
read_actor_t actor, void __user *target)
{
struct file *out_file = NULL;
/* We have to check the read_actor callback function to see if the
* target actually points at a struct file. */
if (actor != file_send_actor)
goto copy_local;
/* are both source and destination within the same file system
* mountpoint? */
if (in_file->f_dentry->d_inode->i_sb != out_file->f_dentry->d_inode->i_sb)
goto copy_local;
/* are we copying the entire source file? */
if (*ppos != 0 || count != in_file->f_dentry->d_inode->i_size)
goto copy_local;
/* and are we at least overwriting the complete destination file?
(alternatively we could check that the out_file is currently empty) */
if (out_file->f_pos != 0 || out_file->f_dentry->d_inode->i_size > count)
goto copy_local;
/* we are in luck and can send a copyfile rpc */
int err = make_copyfile_rpc(in_file, out_file);
/* we probably should force a refresh of out_file as it changed on
* the server and not locally */
MY_I(out_file->f_dentry->d_inode)->time = 0;
return err;
copy_local:
/* no luck, we're sending to something that isn't a file or in the
* same filesystem, or we only copy a partial file. any case, we
* have to perform the copy locally. */
return generic_file_sendfile(in_file, ppos, count, actor, target);
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-11 14:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-05-06 13:17 Jörn Engel
2004-05-06 13:18 ` [PATCH COW] generic_sendpage Jörn Engel
2004-05-06 13:19 ` [PATCH COW] sendfile Jörn Engel
2004-05-06 13:19 ` [PATCH COW] copyfile Jörn Engel
2004-05-06 13:20 ` [PATCH COW] lock_flags Jörn Engel
2004-05-06 13:21 ` [PATCH COW] MAD COW Jörn Engel
2004-05-08 13:45 ` [ANNOUNCEMENT PATCH COW] proof of concept impementation of cowlinks Denis Vlasenko
2004-05-08 22:10 ` Pavel Machek
2004-05-09 14:09 ` Denis Vlasenko
2004-05-09 21:53 ` Pavel Machek
2004-05-10 15:44 ` Jörn Engel
2004-05-10 15:51 ` Pavel Machek
2004-05-10 15:56 ` Jörn Engel
2004-05-12 0:26 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-05-13 10:56 ` Jörn Engel
2004-05-12 20:29 ` Rob Landley
2004-05-08 22:48 ` Pavel Machek
2004-05-10 15:53 ` Jörn Engel
2004-05-10 19:26 ` Jan Harkes
2004-05-11 10:02 ` Jörn Engel
2004-05-11 14:08 ` Jan Harkes [this message]
2004-05-11 14:18 ` Jan Harkes
2004-05-11 14:33 ` Jörn Engel
2004-05-21 23:23 ` Rob Landley
2004-05-25 22:46 ` Jan Harkes
2004-05-11 15:40 ` Steve French
2004-05-11 15:58 ` Jörn Engel
2004-05-10 5:15 ` Eric W. Biederman
2004-05-10 15:59 ` Jörn Engel
2004-05-12 16:39 ` Rob Landley
2004-05-20 13:49 ` Pavel Machek
2004-05-25 21:55 ` Rob Landley
2004-05-25 22:08 ` Pavel Machek
2004-05-25 23:16 ` Rob Landley
2004-05-26 0:16 ` Ian Stirling
2004-05-26 9:52 ` Jörn Engel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040511140853.GT24211@delft.aura.cs.cmu.edu \
--to=jaharkes@cs.cmu.edu \
--cc=joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=smfltc@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®