From: "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@osdl.org>
To: "Cef (LKML)" <cef-lkml@optusnet.com.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, wli@holomorphy.com
Subject: Re: [announce/OT] kerneltop ver. 0.7
Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 14:49:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040524144946.52a356cc.rddunlap@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200405241955.43938.cef-lkml@optusnet.com.au>
On Mon, 24 May 2004 19:55:42 +1000 Cef (LKML) wrote:
| On Mon, 24 May 2004 15:31, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
| > On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 09:50:27PM -0700, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
| > > just a little note about kerneltop...
| > > 'kerneltop' is similar to 'top', but shows only kernel function usage
| > > (modules not included).
| > > I have updated it a bit (now version 0.7) and made sure that it
| > > works OK on Linux 2.6.x.
| > > It's available here:
| > > http://www.xenotime.net/linux/kerneltop/
| >
| > GRRR.. this tries to reset /proc/profile. Multiple megabytes of in-
| > kernel memset() at a frequency of 1Hz are extremely unfriendly.
|
| Following patch primes the buffer first time round (avoids huge total_ticks on
| first pass) and moves total_ticks to the end of the field header bar, saving
| an output line for useful data.
|
| PS: If this keeps going, we should probably take this off-list or move to
| somewhere appropriate.
I applied the total_ticks heading change. Still thinking about the
first-pass-priming-the-pump change. It's not a big deal either way IMO.
| For clarity, you might want to invert the "address function ....." line to
| separate the header from the actual displayed data (like top does).
Done.
Still considering your other suggestions. Thanks.
--
~Randy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-24 21:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-05-24 4:50 Randy.Dunlap
2004-05-24 5:31 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-05-24 9:55 ` Cef (LKML)
2004-05-24 21:49 ` Randy.Dunlap [this message]
2004-05-24 21:47 ` Randy.Dunlap
2004-05-24 5:53 ` Cef (LKML)
2004-05-24 6:00 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-05-24 7:18 ` Cef (LKML)
2004-05-25 19:12 ` Pavel Machek
2004-05-24 23:20 Albert Cahalan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040524144946.52a356cc.rddunlap@osdl.org \
--to=rddunlap@osdl.org \
--cc=cef-lkml@optusnet.com.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®