[PATCH] remove message: POSIX conformance testing by UNIFIX

[PATCH] remove message: POSIX conformance testing by UNIFIX

[Randy.Dunlap]

Remove the outdated "POSIX conformance testing by UNIFIX" message.

There is a general desire to reduce the quantity of noisy and/or
outdated kernel boot-time messages...

Suggested by Andi Kleen.

Ulrich's (old) comments:
http://www.nsa.gov/selinux/list-archive/0107/0525.cfm

Certifying Linux (Linux Journal):
http://www.linuxjournal.com/article.php?sid=0131

Agreed by Tim Bird, no dissenters that I heard of:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=108362954024749&w=2


diffstat:=
 init/main.c |    1 -
 1 files changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff -Naurp ./init/main.c~unifix-message-delete ./init/main.c
--- ./init/main.c~unifix-message-delete	2004-05-23 18:13:07.000000000 -0700
+++ ./init/main.c	2004-05-25 20:45:45.000000000 -0700
@@ -481,7 +481,6 @@ asmlinkage void __init start_kernel(void
 	proc_root_init();
 #endif
 	check_bugs();
-	printk("POSIX conformance testing by UNIFIX\n");
 
 	/* 
 	 *	We count on the initial thread going ok 


--
~Randy

Re: [PATCH] remove message: POSIX conformance testing by UNIFIX

[Randy.Dunlap]

On Tue, 25 May 2004 21:37:10 -0700 Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> wrote:

| > -	printk("POSIX conformance testing by UNIFIX\n");
| 
| That's a stubborn line.  Andrew already tried to remove it
| once, with a patch I believe he called:
| 
|   delete-posix-conformance-testing-by-unifix-message.patch
| 
| in his 2.6.6 *-mm series.  But that patch was neutered by
| some glitch.

OK, I didn't know what happened to it...
(That patch was from me also.)

| You're right - we have concensus on this change.

--
~Randy

Re: [PATCH] remove message: POSIX conformance testing by UNIFIX

[Paul Jackson]

> -	printk("POSIX conformance testing by UNIFIX\n");

That's a stubborn line.  Andrew already tried to remove it
once, with a patch I believe he called:

  delete-posix-conformance-testing-by-unifix-message.patch

in his 2.6.6 *-mm series.  But that patch was neutered by
some glitch.

You're right - we have concensus on this change.

-- 
                          I won't rest till it's the best ...
                          Programmer, Linux Scalability
                          Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.650.933.1373