mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@redhat.com>, Kurt Garloff <kurt@garloff.de>,
	Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>,
	Linux kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Stephen Smalley <sds@epoch.ncsc.mil>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [LSM] Rework LSM hooks
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 11:15:51 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040812111551.L1924@build.pdx.osdl.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040812035854.GA3556@kroah.com>; from greg@kroah.com on Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 08:58:54PM -0700

* Greg KH (greg@kroah.com) wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 09:23:19PM -0400, James Morris wrote:
> > On Thu, 12 Aug 2004, Kurt Garloff wrote:
> > 
> > > The rest of the path is still a win IMVHO.
> > > 
> > > Unfortunately, it has not been discussed here yet.
> > 
> > Defaulting to the capability module is a separate discussion.  I
> > personally don't have a strong opinion on this issue.
> > 
> > Chris, Stephen, Greg? :-)
> 
> I don't really care.  But I think almost every LSM module so far really
> wants the capabilities module at the same time, right?  Maybe we should
> make it easier to do that than what is necessary today.

Yes, we should.

thanks,
-chris
-- 
Linux Security Modules     http://lsm.immunix.org     http://lsm.bkbits.net

  reply	other threads:[~2004-08-12 18:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-08-10  8:57 Kurt Garloff
2004-08-10 13:29 ` James Morris
2004-08-10 20:23   ` Chris Wright
2004-08-10 20:27     ` James Morris
2004-08-10 20:43       ` Chris Wright
2004-08-11  1:55         ` James Morris
2004-08-10 14:16 ` James Morris
2004-08-10 15:02   ` Alan Cox
2004-08-10 19:22     ` James Morris
2004-08-10 20:00       ` Chris Wright
2004-08-10 20:07         ` James Morris
2004-08-10 20:12           ` Chris Wright
2004-08-10 20:31             ` James Morris
2004-08-11  8:47               ` David Mosberger
2004-08-11 15:25                 ` Chris Wright
2004-08-11 18:12                   ` David Mosberger
2004-08-11 18:16                     ` Chris Wright
2004-08-11 22:22             ` Kurt Garloff
2004-08-12  1:23               ` James Morris
2004-08-12  3:58                 ` Greg KH
2004-08-12 18:15                   ` Chris Wright [this message]
2004-08-12 18:17                 ` Chris Wright
2004-08-16 14:19               ` Takashi Iwai
2004-08-11 22:19   ` Kurt Garloff
2004-08-12  1:20     ` James Morris
2004-08-12  2:03       ` Kurt Garloff

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040812111551.L1924@build.pdx.osdl.net \
    --to=chrisw@osdl.org \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=jmorris@redhat.com \
    --cc=kurt@garloff.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sds@epoch.ncsc.mil \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®