* random ioctls - are they supposed to be like this?
@ 2004-08-18 20:42 Bill Nottingham
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Bill Nottingham @ 2004-08-18 20:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
include/linux/random.h has:
#define RNDADDENTROPY _IOW( 'R', 0x03, int [2] )
#define RNDGETPOOL _IOR( 'R', 0x02, int [2] )
However, these seem to be used differently in practice.
For example, the one user of RNDADDENTROPY I find does:
struct {
int ent_count;
int size;
unsigned char data[size];
} entropy;
if (ioctl(fd, RNDADDENTROPY, &entropy) != 0) {
...
And, looking at the random driver, it does appear to expect
this format.
Now, RNDGETPOOL in the kernel does:
if (get_user(size, p) ||
put_user(random_state->poolinfo.poolwords, p++))
return -EFAULT;
...
if (!copy_to_user(p, tmp, size * sizeof(__u32))) {
...
if(put_user(ent_count, p++))
return -EFAULT;
Which obviously isn't going to work right if you
just pass in a two-int structure.
Am I reading this wrong, or are callers just supposed
to know to use the other interface?
Bill
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2004-08-18 20:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-08-18 20:42 random ioctls - are they supposed to be like this? Bill Nottingham
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®