mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Stephen Tweedie <sct@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cmm@us.ibm.com, pbadari@us.ibm.com,
	linuxram@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [Patch 4/6]: ext3 reservations: Turn ext3 per-sb reservations list into an rbtree.
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2004 15:48:33 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040907154833.4cc8d7a3.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200409071302.i87D2bDf030921@sisko.scot.redhat.com>

Stephen Tweedie <sct@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>  struct reserve_window {
> -	struct list_head 	rsv_list;
> -	__u32			rsv_start;
> -	__u32			rsv_end;
> +	struct rb_node	 	rsv_node;
> +	__u32			rsv_start;	/* First byte reserved */
> +	__u32			rsv_end;	/* Last byte reserved or 0 */
>  	atomic_t		rsv_goal_size;
>  	__u32			rsv_alloc_hit;
>  };

Takes this structure up to 32 bytes on x86.  That's a moderate amount of
inode bloat for something which is only used when an application currently
has the inode open for writing.

Have you given any thought to dynamic allocation of the above?

And if we were to do that, there are a few things which we could move out
of the ext3 in-core inode and into the above structure, such as
i_next_alloc_block and i_next_alloc_goal.

Does the reservation code work for directory growth, btw?

  reply	other threads:[~2004-09-07 22:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-09-07 13:02 Stephen Tweedie
2004-09-07 22:48 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2004-09-08 18:05   ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2004-09-08 18:55     ` Mingming Cao
2004-09-15  0:20 ` [Patch 1/2]: ext3 reservation window size increase incorrectly fix Mingming Cao
2004-09-15  0:20 ` [Patch 2/2]: ext3 reservations window allocation fix Mingming Cao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040907154833.4cc8d7a3.akpm@osdl.org \
    --to=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=pbadari@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=sct@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®