From: Song Wang <wsonguci@yahoo.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Routing Performance Comparison between 2.4 and 2.6 kernel
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 16:17:28 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040910231728.62214.qmail@web40004.mail.yahoo.com> (raw)
Hi,
I'm looking for the network packet routing
performance comparison between the latest 2.4
and 2.6 kernel.
I did some initial testing on my mips-based router.
2.6 kernel performed way below 2.4 kernel. It sucks.
Turning on preemption on 2.6 kernel even makes
routing performance worse.
Anybody did a comprehensive study on the routing
performance for 2.6 and 2.4 kernel?
Thanks.
_______________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Shop for Back-to-School deals on Yahoo! Shopping.
http://shopping.yahoo.com/backtoschool
next reply other threads:[~2004-09-10 23:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-10 23:17 Song Wang [this message]
2004-09-10 23:35 ` David S. Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040910231728.62214.qmail@web40004.mail.yahoo.com \
--to=wsonguci@yahoo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®