Re: radeon-pre-2

[Mike Mestnik <cheako911@yahoo.com>]

--- Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:

> On Sad, 2004-09-11 at 16:53, Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
> >      Lastly, I am not saying you have to put all the code in the same
> file.
> > All I am saying we can mandate that all Radeon HW specific code is
> linked
> > in one module - and this would make things easier for developers.
> 
> And if I want dri but not frame buffer, or vice versa, as the majority
> of current users do 
> 
Hopefully any change to the kernel will allow building FB without DRM. 
This is a trivial seperation of code, that I might add has allready been
done, a good point that we should keep it this way.  Yes, there will be
some new memory mngmt code, posibly optonal as well, that is needed for
multi-headed setups.

> >      I would agree that this can be coded as well - but why bother ?
> Or is 
> > it done and working already ?
> 
> Splitting the modules up is the easy bit. The API is the hard bit so you
> might as well formalize it. It also gives the users the ability to not
> load huge radeon modules.
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170
> Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on
> who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. 
> Deadline: Sept. 13. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Dri-devel mailing list
> Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
> 



		
_______________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Express yourself with Y! Messenger! Free. Download now. 
http://messenger.yahoo.com