* tmpfs in latest BK
@ 2004-09-16 19:06 Anton Blanchard
2004-09-16 23:21 ` Hugh Dickins
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Anton Blanchard @ 2004-09-16 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: hugh, akpm; +Cc: linux-kernel
Hi,
I just gave BK a try on my ppc32 laptop and tmpfs looks to be playing up:
# mount -t tmpfs none /mnt
# ls /mnt
ls: mnt: Not a directory
Does this ring any bells? :)
Anton
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: tmpfs in latest BK
2004-09-16 19:06 tmpfs in latest BK Anton Blanchard
@ 2004-09-16 23:21 ` Hugh Dickins
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Hugh Dickins @ 2004-09-16 23:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Anton Blanchard; +Cc: akpm, linux-kernel
On Fri, 17 Sep 2004, Anton Blanchard wrote:
>
> I just gave BK a try on my ppc32 laptop and tmpfs looks to be playing up:
>
> # mount -t tmpfs none /mnt
> # ls /mnt
> ls: mnt: Not a directory
Bizarre.
You think you've caught me indulging in silent semantic changes?
> Does this ring any bells? :)
It's alarming, but I don't recognize the bells.
I blame the removal of SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN, that I copied from you ;)
Seriously, it's fine for me on i386, has been in -mm for ten days,
and I don't see what's architecture dependent about the changes.
Nothing springs to my mind: may I ask you (or any others who find the
same?) to delve into it? If I have any ideas later on, I'll mail again.
Thanks - and sorry for this late and unhelpful response,
Hugh
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-09-16 23:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-09-16 19:06 tmpfs in latest BK Anton Blanchard
2004-09-16 23:21 ` Hugh Dickins
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome