* boot_cpu_data vs current_cpu_data in voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc2-mm1-S1
@ 2004-09-19 14:07 Dominik Brodowski
2004-09-19 17:45 ` Ingo Molnar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Dominik Brodowski @ 2004-09-19 14:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mingo; +Cc: linux-kernel
Ingo,
Your voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc2-mm1-S1 patch contains this change
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ inline void __const_udelay(unsigned long
xloops *= 4;
__asm__("mull %0"
:"=d" (xloops), "=&a" (d0)
- :"1" (xloops),"0" (current_cpu_data.loops_per_jiffy *
(HZ/4)));
+ :"1" (xloops),"0" (boot_cpu_data.loops_per_jiffy * (HZ/4)));
__delay(++xloops);
}
for both x86 and x86_64. And it's wrong. It assumes loops_per_jiffy being
consistent on all CPUs. There _are_ asymetric multiprocessor systems out
there, and some SMP systems can become asymetric as soon as
frequency scaling is enabled. Using boot_cpu_data's loops_per_jiffy instead
of current_cpu_data's loops_per_jiffy causes delays being too short or too
long. So please drop this change.
Thanks,
Dominik
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: boot_cpu_data vs current_cpu_data in voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc2-mm1-S1
2004-09-19 14:07 boot_cpu_data vs current_cpu_data in voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc2-mm1-S1 Dominik Brodowski
@ 2004-09-19 17:45 ` Ingo Molnar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2004-09-19 17:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dominik Brodowski; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Sun, 19 Sep 2004, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
> Your voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc2-mm1-S1 patch contains this change
>
> @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ inline void __const_udelay(unsigned long
> xloops *= 4;
> __asm__("mull %0"
> :"=d" (xloops), "=&a" (d0)
> - :"1" (xloops),"0" (current_cpu_data.loops_per_jiffy *
> (HZ/4)));
> + :"1" (xloops),"0" (boot_cpu_data.loops_per_jiffy * (HZ/4)));
this comes from the BKL patch - this is done to avoid false positives in
the smp_processor_id() debugger.
Ingo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-09-19 17:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-09-19 14:07 boot_cpu_data vs current_cpu_data in voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc2-mm1-S1 Dominik Brodowski
2004-09-19 17:45 ` Ingo Molnar
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®