From: Ankit Jain <ankitjain1580@yahoo.com>
To: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
Cc: linux <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Difference in priority
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 10:28:04 +0100 (BST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041012092804.73700.qmail@web52906.mail.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <416A7FE3.8090106@kolivas.org>
Sorry but iu could not get why are you adding and
subtracting this 60 in priorities. that corelation i
had also got but could not understrand whats this 60?
and also what is this dynamic priority? hows different
from normal priority
thanks
ankit
--- Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org> wrote:
> Con Kolivas wrote:
> > Ankit Jain wrote:
> >
> >> hi
> >>
> >> if somebody knows the difference b/w /PRI of both
> >> these commands because both give different
> results
> >>
> >> ps -Al
> >> & top
> >>
> >> as per priority rule we can set priority upto
> 0-99
> >> but top never shows this high priority
> >
> >
> > Priority values 0-99 are real time ones and
> 100-139 are normal
> > scheduling ones. RT scheduling does not change
> dynamic priority while
> > running wheras normal scheduling does (between
> 100-139). top shows the
> > value of the current dynamic priority in the PRI
> column as the current
> > dynamic priority-100. If you have a real time task
> in top it shows as a
> > -ve value. ps -Al seems to show the current
> dynamic priority+60.
>
> That should read dynamic priority-60 in the PRI
> column.
>
> Cheers,
> Con
>
________________________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping"
your friends today! Download Messenger Now
http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com/download/index.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-12 9:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-11 12:17 Ankit Jain
2004-10-11 12:35 ` Con Kolivas
2004-10-11 12:43 ` Con Kolivas
2004-10-12 9:28 ` Ankit Jain [this message]
2004-10-12 10:40 ` Con Kolivas
2004-10-12 0:57 Albert Cahalan
2004-10-13 0:15 ` Con Kolivas
2004-10-13 1:17 ` Albert Cahalan
2004-10-13 1:26 ` Con Kolivas
2004-10-13 4:58 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-13 5:08 ` Randy.Dunlap
2004-10-13 5:39 ` Lee Revell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041012092804.73700.qmail@web52906.mail.yahoo.com \
--to=ankitjain1580@yahoo.com \
--cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®