mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ankit Jain <ankitjain1580@yahoo.com>
To: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
Cc: linux <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Difference in priority
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 10:28:04 +0100 (BST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041012092804.73700.qmail@web52906.mail.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <416A7FE3.8090106@kolivas.org>

Sorry but iu could not get why are you adding and
subtracting this 60 in priorities. that corelation i
had also got but could not understrand whats this 60?
and also what is this dynamic priority? hows different
from normal priority

thanks

ankit
 --- Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org> wrote: 
> Con Kolivas wrote:
> > Ankit Jain wrote:
> > 
> >> hi
> >>
> >> if somebody knows the difference b/w /PRI of both
> >> these commands because both give different
> results
> >>
> >> ps -Al
> >> & top
> >>
> >> as per priority rule we can set priority upto
> 0-99
> >> but top never shows this high priority
> > 
> > 
> > Priority values 0-99 are real time ones and
> 100-139 are normal 
> > scheduling ones. RT scheduling does not change
> dynamic priority while 
> > running wheras normal scheduling does (between
> 100-139). top shows the 
> > value of the current dynamic priority in the PRI
> column as the current 
> > dynamic priority-100. If you have a real time task
> in top it shows as a 
> > -ve value. ps -Al seems to show the current
> dynamic priority+60.
> 
> That should read dynamic priority-60 in the PRI
> column.
> 
> Cheers,
> Con
>  

________________________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping" 
your friends today! Download Messenger Now 
http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com/download/index.html

  reply	other threads:[~2004-10-12  9:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-10-11 12:17 Ankit Jain
2004-10-11 12:35 ` Con Kolivas
2004-10-11 12:43   ` Con Kolivas
2004-10-12  9:28     ` Ankit Jain [this message]
2004-10-12 10:40       ` Con Kolivas
2004-10-12  0:57 Albert Cahalan
2004-10-13  0:15 ` Con Kolivas
2004-10-13  1:17   ` Albert Cahalan
2004-10-13  1:26     ` Con Kolivas
2004-10-13  4:58     ` Lee Revell
2004-10-13  5:08       ` Randy.Dunlap
2004-10-13  5:39         ` Lee Revell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20041012092804.73700.qmail@web52906.mail.yahoo.com \
    --to=ankitjain1580@yahoo.com \
    --cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®