* [PATCH 1/3][LSM] rename security_scaffolding_startup to security_init
@ 2004-10-22 1:03 Chris Wright
2004-10-22 1:04 ` [PATCH 2/3][LSM] reduce noise during security_register Chris Wright
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wright @ 2004-10-22 1:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: akpm, torvalds; +Cc: linux-kernel
Rename security_scaffolding_startup() to security_init(). It always
bothered me.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>
include/linux/security.h | 2 +-
init/main.c | 2 +-
security/security.c | 8 ++++----
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
===== include/linux/security.h 1.42 vs edited =====
--- 1.42/include/linux/security.h 2004-10-20 01:37:07 -07:00
+++ edited/include/linux/security.h 2004-10-21 16:36:30 -07:00
@@ -1903,7 +1903,7 @@
}
/* prototypes */
-extern int security_scaffolding_startup (void);
+extern int security_init (void);
extern int register_security (struct security_operations *ops);
extern int unregister_security (struct security_operations *ops);
extern int mod_reg_security (const char *name, struct security_operations *ops);
===== init/main.c 1.159 vs edited =====
--- 1.159/init/main.c 2004-10-08 21:09:14 -07:00
+++ edited/init/main.c 2004-10-21 16:35:35 -07:00
@@ -555,7 +555,7 @@
proc_caches_init();
buffer_init();
unnamed_dev_init();
- security_scaffolding_startup();
+ security_init();
vfs_caches_init(num_physpages);
radix_tree_init();
signals_init();
===== security/security.c 1.10 vs edited =====
--- 1.10/security/security.c 2004-08-24 02:08:51 -07:00
+++ edited/security/security.c 2004-10-21 16:44:06 -07:00
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
#include <linux/sched.h>
#include <linux/security.h>
-#define SECURITY_SCAFFOLD_VERSION "1.0.0"
+#define SECURITY_FRAMEWORK_VERSION "1.0.0"
/* things that live in dummy.c */
extern struct security_operations dummy_security_ops;
@@ -49,13 +49,13 @@
}
/**
- * security_scaffolding_startup - initializes the security scaffolding framework
+ * security_init - initializes the security framework
*
* This should be called early in the kernel initialization sequence.
*/
-int __init security_scaffolding_startup (void)
+int __init security_init(void)
{
- printk (KERN_INFO "Security Scaffold v" SECURITY_SCAFFOLD_VERSION
+ printk (KERN_INFO "Security Framework v" SECURITY_FRAMEWORK_VERSION
" initialized\n");
if (verify (&dummy_security_ops)) {
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* [PATCH 2/3][LSM] reduce noise during security_register 2004-10-22 1:03 [PATCH 1/3][LSM] rename security_scaffolding_startup to security_init Chris Wright @ 2004-10-22 1:04 ` Chris Wright 2004-10-22 1:07 ` [PATCH 3/3][LSM] Lindent security/security.c Chris Wright 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Chris Wright @ 2004-10-22 1:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: akpm, torvalds; +Cc: linux-kernel Registering a security module can be a noisy operation, esp. when it retries registration with the primary module. Eliminate some noise, and distinguish the return values for register_security so a module can tell the difference between failure modes. Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org> security.c | 14 ++++---------- 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) --- linus-2.6/security/security.c~verbose 2004-10-21 16:50:30.844353688 -0700 +++ linus-2.6/security/security.c 2004-10-21 17:00:54.386560864 -0700 @@ -29,11 +29,8 @@ static inline int verify (struct security_operations *ops) { /* verify the security_operations structure exists */ - if (!ops) { - printk (KERN_INFO "Passed a NULL security_operations " - "pointer, %s failed.\n", __FUNCTION__); + if (!ops) return -EINVAL; - } security_fixup_ops (ops); return 0; } @@ -85,16 +82,13 @@ int register_security (struct security_operations *ops) { if (verify (ops)) { - printk (KERN_INFO "%s could not verify " + printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s could not verify " "security_operations structure.\n", __FUNCTION__); return -EINVAL; } - if (security_ops != &dummy_security_ops) { - printk (KERN_INFO "There is already a security " - "framework initialized, %s failed.\n", __FUNCTION__); - return -EINVAL; - } + if (security_ops != &dummy_security_ops) + return -EAGAIN; security_ops = ops; ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 3/3][LSM] Lindent security/security.c 2004-10-22 1:04 ` [PATCH 2/3][LSM] reduce noise during security_register Chris Wright @ 2004-10-22 1:07 ` Chris Wright 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Chris Wright @ 2004-10-22 1:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: akpm, torvalds; +Cc: linux-kernel Lindent security/security.c. Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org> security.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------- 1 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) --- linus-2.6/security/security.c~Lindent 2004-10-21 17:16:31.167148568 -0700 +++ linus-2.6/security/security.c 2004-10-21 17:16:46.739781168 -0700 @@ -22,16 +22,16 @@ /* things that live in dummy.c */ extern struct security_operations dummy_security_ops; -extern void security_fixup_ops (struct security_operations *ops); +extern void security_fixup_ops(struct security_operations *ops); struct security_operations *security_ops; /* Initialized to NULL */ -static inline int verify (struct security_operations *ops) +static inline int verify(struct security_operations *ops) { /* verify the security_operations structure exists */ if (!ops) return -EINVAL; - security_fixup_ops (ops); + security_fixup_ops(ops); return 0; } @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ initcall_t *call; call = &__security_initcall_start; while (call < &__security_initcall_end) { - (*call)(); + (*call) (); call++; } } @@ -52,12 +52,12 @@ */ int __init security_init(void) { - printk (KERN_INFO "Security Framework v" SECURITY_FRAMEWORK_VERSION - " initialized\n"); + printk(KERN_INFO "Security Framework v" SECURITY_FRAMEWORK_VERSION + " initialized\n"); - if (verify (&dummy_security_ops)) { - printk (KERN_ERR "%s could not verify " - "dummy_security_ops structure.\n", __FUNCTION__); + if (verify(&dummy_security_ops)) { + printk(KERN_ERR "%s could not verify " + "dummy_security_ops structure.\n", __FUNCTION__); return -EIO; } @@ -79,11 +79,11 @@ * If there is already a security module registered with the kernel, * an error will be returned. Otherwise 0 is returned on success. */ -int register_security (struct security_operations *ops) +int register_security(struct security_operations *ops) { - if (verify (ops)) { + if (verify(ops)) { printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s could not verify " - "security_operations structure.\n", __FUNCTION__); + "security_operations structure.\n", __FUNCTION__); return -EINVAL; } @@ -106,12 +106,12 @@ * an error is returned. Otherwise the default security options is set to the * the dummy_security_ops structure, and 0 is returned. */ -int unregister_security (struct security_operations *ops) +int unregister_security(struct security_operations *ops) { if (ops != security_ops) { - printk (KERN_INFO "%s: trying to unregister " - "a security_opts structure that is not " - "registered, failing.\n", __FUNCTION__); + printk(KERN_INFO "%s: trying to unregister " + "a security_opts structure that is not " + "registered, failing.\n", __FUNCTION__); return -EINVAL; } @@ -132,21 +132,21 @@ * The return value depends on the currently loaded security module, with 0 as * success. */ -int mod_reg_security (const char *name, struct security_operations *ops) +int mod_reg_security(const char *name, struct security_operations *ops) { - if (verify (ops)) { - printk (KERN_INFO "%s could not verify " - "security operations.\n", __FUNCTION__); + if (verify(ops)) { + printk(KERN_INFO "%s could not verify " + "security operations.\n", __FUNCTION__); return -EINVAL; } if (ops == security_ops) { - printk (KERN_INFO "%s security operations " - "already registered.\n", __FUNCTION__); + printk(KERN_INFO "%s security operations " + "already registered.\n", __FUNCTION__); return -EINVAL; } - return security_ops->register_security (name, ops); + return security_ops->register_security(name, ops); } /** @@ -162,15 +162,15 @@ * The return value depends on the currently loaded security module, with 0 as * success. */ -int mod_unreg_security (const char *name, struct security_operations *ops) +int mod_unreg_security(const char *name, struct security_operations *ops) { if (ops == security_ops) { - printk (KERN_INFO "%s invalid attempt to unregister " - " primary security ops.\n", __FUNCTION__); + printk(KERN_INFO "%s invalid attempt to unregister " + " primary security ops.\n", __FUNCTION__); return -EINVAL; } - return security_ops->unregister_security (name, ops); + return security_ops->unregister_security(name, ops); } /** @@ -183,9 +183,9 @@ * This allows the security module to implement the capable function call * however it chooses to. */ -int capable (int cap) +int capable(int cap) { - if (security_ops->capable (current, cap)) { + if (security_ops->capable(current, cap)) { /* capability denied */ return 0; } ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-10-22 2:43 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2004-10-22 1:03 [PATCH 1/3][LSM] rename security_scaffolding_startup to security_init Chris Wright 2004-10-22 1:04 ` [PATCH 2/3][LSM] reduce noise during security_register Chris Wright 2004-10-22 1:07 ` [PATCH 3/3][LSM] Lindent security/security.c Chris Wright
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®