From: Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com>
To: Paolo Ciarrocchi <paolo.ciarrocchi@gmail.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rddunlap@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>,
Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Let's make a small change to the process
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 22:17:16 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200410262220_MC3-1-8D36-77F@compuserve.com> (raw)
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 at 22:44:21 +0200 Paolo Ciarrocchi wrote:
>
>> 2.6-ac seems to be filling this role right now.
>>
>
> If the goal of -ac is to only include those fixes, why can't we rename
> it in something more "intuitive" for the final users ?
> Do you see what I mean ?
AFAICT -ac is not supposed to be a complete collection of bugfixes.
2.6.9-ac3 was certainly missing a lot of them (haven't seen -ac4 yet.)
--Chuck Ebbert 26-Oct-04 20:33:14
next reply other threads:[~2004-10-27 2:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-27 2:17 Chuck Ebbert [this message]
2004-10-27 15:05 ` Alan Cox
2004-10-27 20:38 ` Bill Davidsen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-10-27 19:50 Chuck Ebbert
2004-10-26 10:44 My thoughts on the "new development model" Ed Tomlinson
2004-10-26 11:09 ` Massimo Cetra
2004-10-26 12:08 ` Paolo Ciarrocchi
2004-10-26 19:03 ` Mathieu Segaud
2004-10-26 20:16 ` Let's make a small change to the process Paolo Ciarrocchi
2004-10-26 20:22 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-10-26 20:26 ` Paolo Ciarrocchi
2004-10-26 20:33 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-10-26 20:36 ` Dave Jones
2004-10-26 20:44 ` Paolo Ciarrocchi
2004-10-27 0:51 ` Jan Knutar
2004-10-26 20:48 ` John Richard Moser
2004-10-26 21:00 ` Paolo Ciarrocchi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200410262220_MC3-1-8D36-77F@compuserve.com \
--to=76306.1226@compuserve.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paolo.ciarrocchi@gmail.com \
--cc=rddunlap@osdl.org \
--cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome