From: James Cleverdon <jamesclv@us.ibm.com>
To: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>, ak@suse.de
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clustered apic patch missing APIC_DFR_CLUSTER def
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 16:35:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200410281635.23848.jamesclv@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041028112715.D14339@build.pdx.osdl.net>
Hmmm... The patch containing APIC_DFR_CLUSTER and friends went
into the -mm tree in the June/July timeframe. It must not have
been pushed with the main cluster patch.
You're right, we're using the generic version of
cpu_present_to_apicid(). The cluster one can go.
On Thursday 28 October 2004 11:27 am, Chris Wright wrote:
> The cluster apic support does not compile. I added the
> APIC_DFR_CLUSTER def to asm-x86_64/apicdef.h (stolen from i386 one).
> Also added APIC_DFR_FLAT while there. This may only be papering over
> real fix.
>
> Additionally, cluster_cpu_present_to_apicid() is defined but not used
> anywhere. So remove it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>
>
> ===== include/asm-x86_64/apicdef.h 1.6 vs edited =====
> --- 1.6/include/asm-x86_64/apicdef.h 2004-10-28 00:39:50 -07:00
> +++ edited/include/asm-x86_64/apicdef.h 2004-10-28 11:15:19 -07:00
> @@ -32,6 +32,8 @@
> #define SET_APIC_LOGICAL_ID(x) (((x)<<24))
> #define APIC_ALL_CPUS 0xFFu
> #define APIC_DFR 0xE0
> +#define APIC_DFR_CLUSTER 0x0FFFFFFFu
> +#define APIC_DFR_FLAT 0xFFFFFFFFu
> #define APIC_SPIV 0xF0
> #define APIC_SPIV_FOCUS_DISABLED (1<<9)
> #define APIC_SPIV_APIC_ENABLED (1<<8)
> ===== arch/x86_64/kernel/genapic_cluster.c 1.1 vs edited =====
> --- 1.1/arch/x86_64/kernel/genapic_cluster.c 2004-10-28 00:39:50
> -07:00 +++ edited/arch/x86_64/kernel/genapic_cluster.c 2004-10-28
> 11:18:10 -07:00 @@ -57,14 +57,6 @@
> apic_write_around(APIC_LDR, val);
> }
>
> -static int cluster_cpu_present_to_apicid(int mps_cpu)
> -{
> - if ((unsigned)mps_cpu < NR_CPUS)
> - return (int)bios_cpu_apicid[mps_cpu];
> - else
> - return BAD_APICID;
> -}
> -
> /* Start with all IRQs pointing to boot CPU. IRQ balancing will
> shift them. */
>
> static cpumask_t cluster_target_cpus(void)
--
James Cleverdon
IBM LTC (xSeries Linux Solutions)
{jamesclv(Unix, preferred), cleverdj(Notes)} at us dot ibm dot comm
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-28 23:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-28 18:27 Chris Wright
2004-10-28 23:35 ` James Cleverdon [this message]
2004-10-28 23:38 ` Andi Kleen
2004-10-28 23:51 ` Chris Wright
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200410281635.23848.jamesclv@us.ibm.com \
--to=jamesclv@us.ibm.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=chrisw@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®