* sys_ioperm() allows port offsets > 0x3ff
@ 2004-11-22 15:10 Chuck Ebbert
2004-11-23 0:07 ` Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Chuck Ebbert @ 2004-11-22 15:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Is $SUBJECT a bug? I can see the IO bitmap size was increased in June.
The latest ltp test suite expects offsets > 0x3ff to fail.
--Chuck Ebbert 20-Nov-04 23:52:44
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: sys_ioperm() allows port offsets > 0x3ff
2004-11-22 15:10 sys_ioperm() allows port offsets > 0x3ff Chuck Ebbert
@ 2004-11-23 0:07 ` Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2004-11-23 0:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chuck Ebbert; +Cc: linux-kernel
Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com> wrote:
>
> Is $SUBJECT a bug? I can see the IO bitmap size was increased in June.
>
> The latest ltp test suite expects offsets > 0x3ff to fail.
The size was increased to cover 64k in June of this year.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-11-23 0:05 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-11-22 15:10 sys_ioperm() allows port offsets > 0x3ff Chuck Ebbert
2004-11-23 0:07 ` Andrew Morton
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®