From: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cputime_t patches broke RLIMIT_CPU
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 16:26:15 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200501200026.j0K0QFst021029@magilla.sf.frob.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Linus Torvalds's message of Wednesday, 19 January 2005 16:09:58 -0800 <Pine.LNX.4.58.0501191605380.8178@ppc970.osdl.org>
> So would it not be nicer to just keep everything in seconds instead?
Yes, that's how it was done before. The patch I just posted was intended
to fix the apparent typo without getting any deeper. Below is an untested
alternate patch to restore the old behavior under the new macro regime.
> Alternatively, seriously fix "secs_to_cputime()" to do the proper thing?
> Or did I miss a patch and you already did that?
I wasn't really on a cputime-cleanup rampage, just fixing the obvious bugs
I saw. I hope Martin would like to do some cleanup.
Thanks,
Roland
--- linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
@@ -2299,17 +2325,17 @@ static void account_it_prof(struct task_
static void check_rlimit(struct task_struct *p, cputime_t cputime)
{
cputime_t total, tmp;
+ unsigned long secs;
total = cputime_add(p->utime, p->stime);
- tmp = jiffies_to_cputime(p->signal->rlim[RLIMIT_CPU].rlim_cur);
- if (unlikely(cputime_gt(total, tmp))) {
+ secs = cputime_to_secs(total);
+ if (unlikely(secs >= p->signal->rlim[RLIMIT_CPU].rlim_cur)) {
/* Send SIGXCPU every second. */
tmp = cputime_sub(total, cputime);
- if (cputime_to_secs(tmp) < cputime_to_secs(total))
+ if (cputime_to_secs(tmp) < secs)
send_sig(SIGXCPU, p, 1);
/* and SIGKILL when we go over max.. */
- tmp = jiffies_to_cputime(p->signal->rlim[RLIMIT_CPU].rlim_max);
- if (cputime_gt(total, tmp))
+ if (secs >= p->signal->rlim[RLIMIT_CPU].rlim_max)
send_sig(SIGKILL, p, 1);
}
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-20 0:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-19 20:54 Roland McGrath
2005-01-20 0:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-01-20 0:26 ` Roland McGrath [this message]
2005-01-20 0:47 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200501200026.j0K0QFst021029@magilla.sf.frob.com \
--to=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®