SELinux and sysfs

mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed

* SELinux and sysfs
@ 2005-02-27  5:21 Shawn Starr
  2005-02-28  2:56 ` James Morris
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Shawn Starr @ 2005-02-27  5:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: LKML

Perhaps in future, maybe SELinux could take advantage of sysfs to modify some 
policies? Is this doable?

Sure, we still need some flat files for static configurations, but what about 
dynamic ones?

Shawn.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: SELinux and sysfs
  2005-02-27  5:21 SELinux and sysfs Shawn Starr
@ 2005-02-28  2:56 ` James Morris
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: James Morris @ 2005-02-28  2:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Shawn Starr; +Cc: LKML

On Sun, 27 Feb 2005, Shawn Starr wrote:

> Perhaps in future, maybe SELinux could take advantage of sysfs to modify some 
> policies? Is this doable?
> Sure, we still need some flat files for static configurations, but what about 
> dynamic ones?

This is already possible via the 'booleans' directory under the selinuxfs
root.

See http://www.tresys.com/Downloads/selinux-tools/README-COND.txt


- James
-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@redhat.com>



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2005-02-28  2:56 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-02-27  5:21 SELinux and sysfs Shawn Starr
2005-02-28  2:56 ` James Morris

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®