From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
Cc: torvalds@osdl.org, linux-pcmcia@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jt@hpl.hp.com
Subject: Re: PCMCIA product id strings -> hashes generation at compilation time? [Was: Re: [patch 14/38] pcmcia: id_table for wavelan_cs]
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 12:34:26 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050308123426.249fa934.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050308191138.GA16169@isilmar.linta.de>
Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net> wrote:
>
> Most pcmcia devices are matched to drivers using "product ID strings"
> embedded in the devices' Card Information Structures, as "manufactor ID /
> card ID" matches are much less reliable. Unfortunately, these strings cannot
> be passed to userspace for easy userspace-based loading of appropriate
> modules (MODNAME -- hotplug), so my suggestion is to also store crc32 hashes
> of the strings in the MODULE_DEVICE_TABLEs, e.g.:
>
> PCMCIA_DEVICE_PROD_ID12("LINKSYS", "E-CARD", 0xf7cb0b07, 0x6701da11),
What is the difficulty in passing these strings via /sbin/hotplug arguments?
> ...
> To make the life easier for device driver authors,
> - a big warning is put into dmesg if a pcmcia driver is inserted
> into the kernel and the hash mentioned in PCMCIA_DEVICE_PROD_ID()
> is incorrect,
As long as the kernel shouts loudly at the driver developer at
development-time, and that shouting mentions a bit of documentation in
Documentation/somewhere, I expect we'll be OK.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-08 20:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20050227161308.GO7351@dominikbrodowski.de>
[not found] ` <20050307225355.GB30371@bougret.hpl.hp.com>
[not found] ` <20050307230102.GA29779@isilmar.linta.de>
[not found] ` <20050307150957.0456dd75.akpm@osdl.org>
[not found] ` <20050307232339.GA30057@isilmar.linta.de>
2005-03-08 19:11 ` Dominik Brodowski
2005-03-08 20:34 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2005-03-08 22:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-03-08 23:16 ` Dominik Brodowski
2005-03-08 23:37 ` Greg KH
2005-03-08 23:46 ` Dominik Brodowski
2005-03-08 23:39 ` Dominik Brodowski
2005-03-09 5:45 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-03-09 6:00 ` Greg KH
2005-03-09 7:21 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-03-09 7:19 ` Dominik Brodowski
2005-03-09 7:36 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050308123426.249fa934.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=jt@hpl.hp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pcmcia@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®