From: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>
To: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
Cc: Junfeng Yang <yjf@stanford.edu>,
nfs@lists.sourceforge.net,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, mc@cs.Stanford.EDU
Subject: Re: [CHECKER] inconsistent NFS stat cache (NFS on ext3, 2.6.11)
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 15:04:12 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050313200412.GA21521@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1110690267.24123.7.camel@lade.trondhjem.org>
On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 12:04:27AM -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> lau den 12.03.2005 Klokka 03:56 (-0800) skreiv Junfeng Yang:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We checked NFS on top of ext3 using FiSC (our file system model checker)
> > and found a case where NFS stat cache can contain inconsistent entries.
> >
> > Basically, to trigger this inconsistency, just do the following steps:
> > 1. create a file A1, write a few bytes to it, so A1 is 4 words
> > 2. create a hard link A2, pointing to A1
> > 3. stat on A2. A2's size is 4 words
> > 4. truncate A1 to a larger size, write a few bytes at the end. now it's
> > 1031 words.
> > 5. stat on A2. it's size is still 4 words, which should be 1031 words
> >
> > We have a test case to re-create this warning. You can download it at
> > http://fisc.stanford.edu/bug16/crash.c. It includes some sudo commands
> > to mount nfs partitions, which you might want to change according to your
> > local settings.
> >
> > cat /etc/exports shows:
> > /mnt/sbd0-export localhost(rw,sync)
> > /mnt/sbd1-export localhost(rw,sync)
> >
> > Let me know if you have any problems reproducing the warning. We'd
> > appreciate any confirmations/clarifications.
> >
>
> This is a known problem. Turn off the (default - grrr) subtree checking
> export option on the server, and it will all work properly. The subtree
> checking option violates the NFS standards for filehandle generation in
> so many ways, that it isn't even funny.
I can't find any documentation about this, but it seems like the same
problem that has been causing me headaches lately; when I replace glibc
from the server side of an nfsroot, the client has a couple of
variously wrong reads before it sees the new files. If it breaks NFS
so badly, why is it the default for the Linux NFS server?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-13 20:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-12 11:56 Junfeng Yang
2005-03-13 5:04 ` Trond Myklebust
2005-03-13 6:16 ` Junfeng Yang
2005-03-13 20:04 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2005-03-13 20:42 ` Trond Myklebust
2005-03-13 20:46 ` Trond Myklebust
2005-03-14 0:35 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-03-14 0:50 ` Trond Myklebust
2005-03-14 0:54 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-03-14 0:56 ` Neil Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050313200412.GA21521@nevyn.them.org \
--to=dan@debian.org \
--cc=ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mc@cs.Stanford.EDU \
--cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
--cc=yjf@stanford.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®