mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
To: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Tim Schmielau <tim@physik3.uni-rostock.de>,
	George Anzinger <george@mvista.com>,
	albert@users.sourceforge.net,
	Ulrich Windl <ulrich.windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de>,
	Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>,
	Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.de>,
	David Mosberger <davidm@hpl.hp.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
	paulus@samba.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com,
	keith maanthey <kmannth@us.ibm.com>,
	Patricia Gaughen <gone@us.ibm.com>,
	Chris McDermott <lcm@us.ibm.com>, Max Asbock <masbock@us.ibm.com>,
	mahuja@us.ibm.com, Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>,
	Darren Hart <darren@dvhart.com>,
	"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@us.ibm.com>,
	Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>,
	donf@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] new timeofday arch specific hooks  (v. A3)
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 11:53:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050316105326.GA1348@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1110937497.30498.504.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com>


> > Changing its name is okay... your device probably will not have any
> > user-accessible controls, right?
> 
> Well, at some point I want to have some way for the user to be able to
> select which timesource they want to be used. Similar to the current
> "clock=" boot option override, there would be some sort of sysfs
> timesource entry that users could "echo tsc" or whatever into in order
> to force the system to use the tsc timesource at runtime.
> 
> This however would be separate from the timeofday suspend/resume hooks,
> so its probably not an issue. Let me know if I'm wrong.

No, it should not be a problem. And yes, you could probably use same
sysfs code to select timesource... Just make sure that name is stable
before you publish that interface too much.
								Pavel
-- 
People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers...
...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!

  reply	other threads:[~2005-03-16 10:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-03-12  1:24 [RFC][PATCH] new timeofday core subsystem " john stultz
2005-03-12  1:25 ` [RFC][PATCH] new timeofday arch specific hooks " john stultz
2005-03-12  1:26   ` [RFC][PATCH] new timeofday arch specific timesource drivers " john stultz
2005-03-12  5:52   ` [RFC][PATCH] new timeofday arch specific hooks " Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-03-14 18:09     ` john stultz
2005-03-15 22:59   ` Pavel Machek
2005-03-15 23:42     ` john stultz
2005-03-15 23:44       ` Pavel Machek
2005-03-16  1:44         ` john stultz
2005-03-16 10:53           ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2005-03-13  0:49 ` [RFC][PATCH] new timeofday core subsystem " Matt Mackall
2005-03-13  1:46   ` Andreas Schwab
2005-03-14 18:42   ` john stultz
2005-03-14 19:29     ` Matt Mackall
2005-03-14 19:43       ` john stultz
2005-03-14 19:51         ` Matt Mackall
2005-03-14 20:04           ` john stultz
2005-03-14 20:27             ` Matt Mackall
2005-03-15  0:01               ` Christoph Lameter
2005-03-15  2:16               ` Albert Cahalan
2005-03-15  3:22                 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-03-15 15:23                   ` Albert Cahalan
2005-03-15 15:52                     ` Chris Friesen
2005-03-17 16:55                     ` Russell King
2005-03-17 19:44                       ` Albert Cahalan
2005-03-17 20:28                         ` Russell King
2005-03-15  0:28         ` Christoph Lameter
2005-03-15  0:43           ` john stultz
2005-03-14 23:40     ` George Anzinger
2005-03-15  1:11       ` [topic change] jiffies as a time value john stultz
2005-03-15 23:01         ` George Anzinger
2005-03-16  3:57           ` john stultz
2005-03-15  0:07 ` [RFC][PATCH] new timeofday core subsystem (v. A3) Christoph Lameter
2005-03-15  5:37 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-03-15 18:25   ` john stultz
2005-03-15 22:08     ` George Anzinger
2005-03-17  8:15     ` Ulrich Windl
2005-03-15  6:09 ` Christoph Lameter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050316105326.GA1348@elf.ucw.cz \
    --to=pavel@suse.cz \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=albert@users.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=anton@samba.org \
    --cc=clameter@sgi.com \
    --cc=darren@dvhart.com \
    --cc=davidm@hpl.hp.com \
    --cc=djwong@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=donf@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=george@mvista.com \
    --cc=gone@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=kmannth@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=lcm@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@dominikbrodowski.de \
    --cc=mahuja@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=masbock@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=nacc@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=tim@physik3.uni-rostock.de \
    --cc=ulrich.windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome