mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* 3c59x concerns on 2.4->2.6 update?
@ 2005-03-18 10:34 Matthias Andree
  2005-03-19 10:22 ` Steffen Klassert
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Matthias Andree @ 2005-03-18 10:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-net, Linux-Kernel mailing list

Hi,

I've recently upgraded a router which has three 3Com900C Tornado cards
revisions 74 and 78 from Linux 2.4 to 2.6.

IIRC, Linux 2.4 allowed to report if the link beat was sensed to be 10
or 100 mbps, Linux 2.6 does not. One of these cards is attached to
peculiar network gear and needs to be forced to 100baseTx-FD.
I configured options=0x204 for that interface, which sorta worked;
vortex-diag and mii-diag still report autonegotiation were enabled.
Strange.

ethtool (I tried v2 and v3) does not appear to work at all for 3C900C
cards, "No data available" if run without options.

Any insight into these would be appreciated,

-- 
Matthias Andree

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: 3c59x concerns on 2.4->2.6 update?
  2005-03-18 10:34 3c59x concerns on 2.4->2.6 update? Matthias Andree
@ 2005-03-19 10:22 ` Steffen Klassert
  2005-03-19 12:27   ` Matthias Andree
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Steffen Klassert @ 2005-03-19 10:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Matthias Andree; +Cc: linux-net, linux-kernel

In 2.6.11 ethtool data should be available. Please let me know if
you are using 2.6.11 and ethtool does not work with your card. 

I have no Tornado card to test but with 3c905/3c905B cards and 
options=0x204 configured, mii-diag reports:
Auto-negotiation disabled, with Speed fixed at 100 mbps, full-duplex.

I suppose you talking about 3c905C Tornado cards 
(3c900 cards are not of Tornado type).

Steffen

On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 11:34:19AM +0100, Matthias Andree wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I've recently upgraded a router which has three 3Com900C Tornado cards
> revisions 74 and 78 from Linux 2.4 to 2.6.
> 
> IIRC, Linux 2.4 allowed to report if the link beat was sensed to be 10
> or 100 mbps, Linux 2.6 does not. One of these cards is attached to
> peculiar network gear and needs to be forced to 100baseTx-FD.
> I configured options=0x204 for that interface, which sorta worked;
> vortex-diag and mii-diag still report autonegotiation were enabled.
> Strange.
> 
> ethtool (I tried v2 and v3) does not appear to work at all for 3C900C
> cards, "No data available" if run without options.
> 
> Any insight into these would be appreciated,
> 
> -- 
> Matthias Andree
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: 3c59x concerns on 2.4->2.6 update?
  2005-03-19 10:22 ` Steffen Klassert
@ 2005-03-19 12:27   ` Matthias Andree
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Matthias Andree @ 2005-03-19 12:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-net, linux-kernel

Steffen Klassert schrieb am 2005-03-19:

> In 2.6.11 ethtool data should be available. Please let me know if
> you are using 2.6.11 and ethtool does not work with your card. 
> 
> I have no Tornado card to test but with 3c905/3c905B cards and 
> options=0x204 configured, mii-diag reports:
> Auto-negotiation disabled, with Speed fixed at 100 mbps, full-duplex.
> 
> I suppose you talking about 3c905C Tornado cards 
> (3c900 cards are not of Tornado type).

Ouch. Yes indeed, 3C905C. Please excuse my spreading confusion here.
(I also have 3C900 Combo here, these are Boomerang cards.)

I'll try 2.6.11 as workload permits, the machine is a router in
production with SuSE 9.2 (2.6.8 + SuSE hacks, "2.6.8-24.11-default")
kernel.

-- 
Matthias Andree

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2005-03-19 12:27 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-03-18 10:34 3c59x concerns on 2.4->2.6 update? Matthias Andree
2005-03-19 10:22 ` Steffen Klassert
2005-03-19 12:27   ` Matthias Andree

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®