140 bugs, many of which are post-2.6.10 regressions - got a list?

140 bugs, many of which are post-2.6.10 regressions - got a list?

[Jesper Juhl]

Hi Andrew,

In the 2.6.12-rc1-mm1 announce.txt you say

"- Linus is away this week. Not a lot more should be going into 2.6.12 now 
and I have a list of ~140 bugs, many of which are post-2.6.10 regressions.  
We should fix these."

I'm wondering if you have a list of those bugs somewhere?

I'd like to see if I could deal with some of those, and that task is made 
infinitely more aproachable by having knowledge of what the bugs actually 
are :)


-- 
Jesper Juhl

Re: 140 bugs, many of which are post-2.6.10 regressions - got a list?

[Andrew Morton]

Jesper Juhl <juhl-lkml@dif.dk> wrote:
>
> In the 2.6.12-rc1-mm1 announce.txt you say
> 
>  "- Linus is away this week. Not a lot more should be going into 2.6.12 now 
>  and I have a list of ~140 bugs, many of which are post-2.6.10 regressions.  
>  We should fix these."
> 
>  I'm wondering if you have a list of those bugs somewhere?

I need to get down and sort through the list, categorise, weed things out.

Re: 140 bugs, many of which are post-2.6.10 regressions - got a list?

[Jan Engelhardt]

>>  I'm wondering if you have a list of those bugs somewhere?
>I need to get down and sort through the list, categorise, weed things out.

How about the "unplugged" list?



Jan Engelhardt
-- 

Re: 140 bugs, many of which are post-2.6.10 regressions - got a list?

[Jan Engelhardt]

Jesper Juhl wrote:
>I'm wondering if you have a list of those bugs somewhere?

I think I've found something in his tree...
http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/must-fix/
Not sure if it is what you look for.


Jan Engelhardt
-- 

Re: 140 bugs, many of which are post-2.6.10 regressions - got a list?

[Jesper Juhl]

On Tue, 22 Mar 2005, Jan Engelhardt wrote:

> 
> Jesper Juhl wrote:
> >I'm wondering if you have a list of those bugs somewhere?
> 
> I think I've found something in his tree...
> http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/must-fix/
> Not sure if it is what you look for.
> 
It certainly looks like a good place to start - thanks.

I'll dig through those docs and see what I can verify is still a problem 
and that I also have some chance of fixing - we'll see if it results in 
patches :)


/Jesper

Re: 140 bugs, many of which are post-2.6.10 regressions - got a list?

[Jan Engelhardt]

>> I think I've found something in his tree...
>> http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/must-fix/
>> Not sure if it is what you look for.
>> 
>It certainly looks like a good place to start - thanks.

Ah sh**, just look at the date: 2003.



Jan Engelhardt
-- 

Re: 140 bugs, many of which are post-2.6.10 regressions - got a list?

[Jesper Juhl]

On Tue, 22 Mar 2005, Jan Engelhardt wrote:

> 
> >> I think I've found something in his tree...
> >> http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/must-fix/
> >> Not sure if it is what you look for.
> >> 
> >It certainly looks like a good place to start - thanks.
> 
> Ah sh**, just look at the date: 2003.
> 
Hmm, yeah, I noticed that as well, pretty old.. but still, it's a place to 
start until Andrew comes up with a more up-to-date list :)  Have to work 
with what you can find :)  I see he also posted a list (of email 
subjects aparently) in another thread, that should provide some things to 
go on as well.

/Jesper

Re: 140 bugs, many of which are post-2.6.10 regressions - got a list?

[zyphr]

On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 15:14:47 +0100 (MET), Jan Engelhardt
<jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de> wrote:
> 
> Jesper Juhl wrote:
> >I'm wondering if you have a list of those bugs somewhere?
> 
> I think I've found something in his tree...
> http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/must-fix/
> Not sure if it is what you look for.
> 
> 
> Jan Engelhardt

Those are almost 2 years old ;-)

Re: 140 bugs, many of which are post-2.6.10 regressions - got a list?

[Jan Engelhardt]

>Those are almost 2 years old ;-)

Jesper and me found that out about 17 hours before you :p


Jan Engelhardt
--