mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: [ACPI] Re: [RFC/Patch 0/12] ACPI based root bridge hot-add
@ 2005-03-21 20:34 Paul Ionescu
  2005-03-21 22:57 ` Rajesh Shah
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Paul Ionescu @ 2005-03-21 20:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rajesh Shah; +Cc: acpi-devel, linux-kernel

Hi Rajesh,

--- Rajesh Shah <rajesh.shah@intel.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 03:50:16PM +0200, Paul Ionescu wrote:
> > 
> > Does this mean that when it will be ported for i386, I will be able to
> > really use my Docking Station ?
> 
> No. The current patches only trigger when a _root_ bridge is
> hot-added, not a PCI to PCI bridge (which is what the docking 
> station is). The code to support p2p bridge hotplug will benefit
> from these patches but more code is needed to support that.
> 

Thanks for the info.
Is p2p hotplug in your roadmap (for i386) ?
Can you please give me an example of a root bridge ?

Thanks,
Paul



		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/ 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [ACPI] Re: [RFC/Patch 0/12] ACPI based root bridge hot-add
  2005-03-21 20:34 [ACPI] Re: [RFC/Patch 0/12] ACPI based root bridge hot-add Paul Ionescu
@ 2005-03-21 22:57 ` Rajesh Shah
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Rajesh Shah @ 2005-03-21 22:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paul Ionescu; +Cc: Rajesh Shah, acpi-devel, linux-kernel

On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 12:34:07PM -0800, Paul Ionescu wrote:
> 
> --- Rajesh Shah <rajesh.shah@intel.com> wrote:
> > 
> > No. The current patches only trigger when a _root_ bridge is
> > hot-added, not a PCI to PCI bridge (which is what the docking 
> > station is). The code to support p2p bridge hotplug will benefit
> > from these patches but more code is needed to support that.
> > 
> 
> Thanks for the info.
> Is p2p hotplug in your roadmap (for i386) ?
> Can you please give me an example of a root bridge ?
> 
I believe others are already working on it. I expect to free up
a bit more in a couple of weeks.  If I don't see any patches or
indication of activity by then, I'll work on adding this support
too.

Rajesh

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [ACPI] Re: [RFC/Patch 0/12] ACPI based root bridge hot-add
  2005-03-19 13:50 ` Paul Ionescu
@ 2005-03-21 19:14   ` Rajesh Shah
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Rajesh Shah @ 2005-03-21 19:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paul Ionescu; +Cc: acpi-devel, linux-kernel

On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 03:50:16PM +0200, Paul Ionescu wrote:
> 
> Does this mean that when it will be ported for i386, I will be able to
> really use my Docking Station ?

No. The current patches only trigger when a _root_ bridge is
hot-added, not a PCI to PCI bridge (which is what the docking 
station is). The code to support p2p bridge hotplug will benefit
from these patches but more code is needed to support that.

> Does it rescan the DSDT to find new additions to ACPI devices ?
> 
It scans the ACPI namespace under the root bridge that was added.
Any pci devices underneath are scanned and added, but there isn't
any code to look for non-PCI devices there.

Rajesh

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2005-03-21 23:02 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-03-21 20:34 [ACPI] Re: [RFC/Patch 0/12] ACPI based root bridge hot-add Paul Ionescu
2005-03-21 22:57 ` Rajesh Shah
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-03-18 21:38 Rajesh Shah
2005-03-19 13:50 ` Paul Ionescu
2005-03-21 19:14   ` [ACPI] " Rajesh Shah

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome