From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Cc: dtor_core@ameritech.net, Stefan Seyfried <seife@suse.de>,
Andy Isaacson <adi@hexapodia.org>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.cz>,
Linux-pm mailing list <linux-pm@lists.osdl.org>
Subject: Re: swsusp 'disk' fails in bk-current - intel_agp at fault?
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 01:05:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200503300105.03861.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050329211239.GG8125@elf.ucw.cz>
Hi,
On Tuesday, 29 of March 2005 23:12, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > I don't really want us to try execve during resume... Could we simply
> > > artifically fail that execve with something if (in_suspend()) return
> > > -EINVAL; [except that in_suspend() just is not there, but there were
> > > some proposals to add it].
> > >
> > > Or just avoid calling hotplug at all in resume case? And then do
> > > coldplug-like scan when userspace is ready...
> > >
> >
> > I am leaning towards calling disable_usermodehelper (not writtent yet)
> > after swsusp completes snapshotting memory. We really don't care about
> > hotplug events in this case and this will allow keeping "normal"
> > resume in drivers as is. What do you think?
>
> That would certianly do the trick.
>
> [Or perhaps in_suspend() is slightly nicer solution? People wanted it
> for other stuff (sanity checking, like BUG_ON(in_suspend())), too....]
IMHO, they are not mutually exclusive. However, by using
disable_usermodehelper we would get rid of the reason (ie hotplug events)
instead of just curing the symptoms (ie execve() during suspend).
Greets,
Rafael
--
- Would you tell me, please, which way I ought to go from here?
- That depends a good deal on where you want to get to.
-- Lewis Carroll "Alice's Adventures in Wonderland"
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-29 23:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-23 18:49 Andy Isaacson
2005-03-24 14:27 ` Stefan Seyfried
2005-03-24 18:10 ` Andy Isaacson
2005-03-24 19:18 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-03-24 20:20 ` Andy Isaacson
2005-03-24 21:10 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-03-24 23:54 ` Andy Isaacson
2005-03-25 9:22 ` Stefan Seyfried
2005-03-25 10:13 ` Pavel Machek
2005-03-25 14:19 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-03-25 14:24 ` Pavel Machek
2005-03-25 14:52 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-03-25 15:42 ` Pavel Machek
2005-03-25 16:04 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-03-28 23:00 ` Pavel Machek
2005-03-29 23:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-03-29 21:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-03-25 18:36 ` Andy Isaacson
2005-03-29 16:18 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-03-29 18:18 ` Pavel Machek
2005-03-29 19:11 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-03-29 19:23 ` Pavel Machek
2005-03-29 20:05 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-03-29 20:52 ` Pavel Machek
2005-03-29 21:07 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-03-29 21:12 ` Pavel Machek
2005-03-29 21:33 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-03-29 21:44 ` Pavel Machek
2005-03-29 22:31 ` [linux-pm] " Nigel Cunningham
2005-03-29 22:35 ` Pavel Machek
2005-03-29 23:46 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-03-31 7:26 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-03-31 8:39 ` Pavel Machek
2005-03-31 15:02 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-03-31 16:02 ` Patrick Mochel
2005-03-31 16:32 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-03-31 22:16 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-03-31 22:18 ` Pavel Machek
2005-03-31 22:28 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-04-01 8:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-04-01 10:33 ` Stefan Seyfried
2005-03-29 23:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2005-03-29 21:23 ` Patrick Mochel
2005-03-29 21:38 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-03-30 9:52 ` Greg KH
2005-03-25 14:58 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-03-30 7:26 ` Andy Isaacson
2005-03-24 21:14 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-03-24 20:38 ` Stefan Seyfried
2005-03-29 18:42 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-03-30 7:24 ` Andy Isaacson
[not found] ` <20050525171825.51a06908.akpm@osdl.org>
2005-05-27 17:44 ` Andy Isaacson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200503300105.03861.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=adi@hexapodia.org \
--cc=dtor_core@ameritech.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=seife@suse.de \
--cc=vojtech@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®