From: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
To: dtor_core@ameritech.net
Cc: Patrick Mochel <mochel@digitalimplant.org>,
Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.cz>,
Andy Isaacson <adi@hexapodia.org>,
Linux-pm mailing list <linux-pm@lists.osdl.org>,
Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@cyclades.com>,
Stefan Seyfried <seife@suse.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] Re: swsusp 'disk' fails in bk-current - intel_agp at fault?
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 00:18:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050331221814.GC1802@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d120d50005033108321c8f4ae7@mail.gmail.com>
Hi!
> > > Ok, what do you think about this one?
> > >
> > > ===================================================================
> > >
> > > swsusp: disable usermodehelper after generating memory snapshot and
> > > before resuming devices, so when device fails to resume we
> > > won't try to call hotplug - userspace stopped anyway.
> >
> > Hm, shouldn't we disable it before we start to freeze processes? We don't
> > want any more processes trying to start up after we've taken care of
> > them..
> >
>
> Can't a device be removed (for any reason) _while_ we are freezing
> processes? I think freeszing code will properly deal with it... What
> about suspend semantics - if suspend fails do we say the device should
> be operational or the system should attempt to re-initialize? I.e. we
> are not doing suspend after all - can we still drop messages on the
> floor? After all, we still have ability to run coldplug after failed
> suspend.
I believe we should freeze hotplug before processes. Dropping messages
on the floor should not be a problem, we should just call coldplug
after failed suspend.
Pavel
--
People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers...
...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-31 22:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-23 18:49 Andy Isaacson
2005-03-24 14:27 ` Stefan Seyfried
2005-03-24 18:10 ` Andy Isaacson
2005-03-24 19:18 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-03-24 20:20 ` Andy Isaacson
2005-03-24 21:10 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-03-24 23:54 ` Andy Isaacson
2005-03-25 9:22 ` Stefan Seyfried
2005-03-25 10:13 ` Pavel Machek
2005-03-25 14:19 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-03-25 14:24 ` Pavel Machek
2005-03-25 14:52 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-03-25 15:42 ` Pavel Machek
2005-03-25 16:04 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-03-28 23:00 ` Pavel Machek
2005-03-29 23:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-03-29 21:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-03-25 18:36 ` Andy Isaacson
2005-03-29 16:18 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-03-29 18:18 ` Pavel Machek
2005-03-29 19:11 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-03-29 19:23 ` Pavel Machek
2005-03-29 20:05 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-03-29 20:52 ` Pavel Machek
2005-03-29 21:07 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-03-29 21:12 ` Pavel Machek
2005-03-29 21:33 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-03-29 21:44 ` Pavel Machek
2005-03-29 22:31 ` [linux-pm] " Nigel Cunningham
2005-03-29 22:35 ` Pavel Machek
2005-03-29 23:46 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-03-31 7:26 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-03-31 8:39 ` Pavel Machek
2005-03-31 15:02 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-03-31 16:02 ` Patrick Mochel
2005-03-31 16:32 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-03-31 22:16 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-03-31 22:18 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2005-03-31 22:28 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-04-01 8:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-04-01 10:33 ` Stefan Seyfried
2005-03-29 23:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-03-29 21:23 ` [linux-pm] " Patrick Mochel
2005-03-29 21:38 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-03-30 9:52 ` Greg KH
2005-03-25 14:58 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-03-30 7:26 ` Andy Isaacson
2005-03-24 21:14 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-03-24 20:38 ` Stefan Seyfried
2005-03-29 18:42 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-03-30 7:24 ` Andy Isaacson
[not found] ` <20050525171825.51a06908.akpm@osdl.org>
2005-05-27 17:44 ` Andy Isaacson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050331221814.GC1802@elf.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=adi@hexapodia.org \
--cc=dtor_core@ameritech.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=mochel@digitalimplant.org \
--cc=ncunningham@cyclades.com \
--cc=seife@suse.de \
--cc=vojtech@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome