From: "Chen, Kenneth W" <kenneth.w.chen@intel.com>
To: "'Nick Piggin'" <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: "'Andrew Morton'" <akpm@osdl.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: Industry db benchmark result on recent 2.6 kernels
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 17:38:19 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200503300138.j2U1cJg03717@unix-os.sc.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <424A0172.2010609@yahoo.com.au>
Nick Piggin wrote on Tuesday, March 29, 2005 5:32 PM
> If it is doing a lot of mapping/unmapping (or fork/exit), then that
> might explain why 2.6.11 is worse.
>
> Fortunately there are more patches to improve this on the way.
Once benchmark reaches steady state, there is no mapping/unmapping
going on. Actually, the virtual address space for all the processes
are so stable at steady state that we don't even see it grow or shrink.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-30 1:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-28 19:33 Chen, Kenneth W
2005-03-28 19:50 ` Dave Hansen
2005-03-28 20:01 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-03-30 0:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-03-30 0:22 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-03-30 0:46 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-03-30 0:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-03-30 1:31 ` Nick Piggin
2005-03-30 1:38 ` Chen, Kenneth W [this message]
2005-03-30 1:56 ` Nick Piggin
2005-03-31 14:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-03-31 19:53 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-03-31 20:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-03-31 20:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-03-31 22:14 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-03-31 23:35 ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-01 6:05 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-01 6:34 ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-01 7:19 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-01 6:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-01 22:32 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-04-01 22:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-02 2:19 ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-04 1:40 ` Kevin Puetz
2005-04-02 1:44 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-02 2:05 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-04-02 2:38 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-03 6:36 ` David Lang
2005-04-03 6:53 ` Andreas Dilger
2005-04-03 7:23 ` David Lang
2005-04-03 7:38 ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-01 6:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-01 9:29 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-01 10:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-01 14:39 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-01 4:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-01 5:14 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-04-01 22:51 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-04-01 16:34 Manfred Spraul
2005-04-02 1:00 Chen, Kenneth W
2005-04-02 2:12 ` Nick Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200503300138.j2U1cJg03717@unix-os.sc.intel.com \
--to=kenneth.w.chen@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®