From: Paul Jackson <pj@engr.sgi.com>
To: "Chen, Kenneth W" <kenneth.w.chen@intel.com>
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, torvalds@osdl.org,
akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Industry db benchmark result on recent 2.6 kernels
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 17:44:35 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050401174435.4117c940.pj@engr.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200504012232.j31MWTg03706@unix-os.sc.intel.com>
Kenneth wrote:
> Paul, you definitely want to check this out on your large numa box.
Interesting - thanks. I can get a kernel patched and booted on a big
box easily enough. I don't know how to run an "industry db benchmark",
and benchmarks aren't my forte.
Should I rope in one of our guys who is benchmark savvy, or are there
some instructions you can point to for running an appropriate benchmark?
Or are we just interested, first of all, in what sort of values this
cost matrix gets initialized with (and how slow it is to compute)?
I can get time on a 64-cpu with a days notice, and time on a 512-cpu
with 2 or 3 days notice.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@engr.sgi.com> 1.650.933.1373, 1.925.600.0401
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-02 1:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-28 19:33 Chen, Kenneth W
2005-03-28 19:50 ` Dave Hansen
2005-03-28 20:01 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-03-30 0:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-03-30 0:22 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-03-30 0:46 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-03-30 0:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-03-30 1:31 ` Nick Piggin
2005-03-30 1:38 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-03-30 1:56 ` Nick Piggin
2005-03-31 14:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-03-31 19:53 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-03-31 20:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-03-31 20:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-03-31 22:14 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-03-31 23:35 ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-01 6:05 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-01 6:34 ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-01 7:19 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-01 6:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-01 22:32 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-04-01 22:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-02 2:19 ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-04 1:40 ` Kevin Puetz
2005-04-02 1:44 ` Paul Jackson [this message]
2005-04-02 2:05 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-04-02 2:38 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-03 6:36 ` David Lang
2005-04-03 6:53 ` Andreas Dilger
2005-04-03 7:23 ` David Lang
2005-04-03 7:38 ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-01 6:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-01 9:29 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-01 10:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-01 14:39 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-01 4:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-01 5:14 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-04-01 22:51 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-04-01 16:34 Manfred Spraul
2005-04-02 1:00 Chen, Kenneth W
2005-04-02 2:12 ` Nick Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050401174435.4117c940.pj@engr.sgi.com \
--to=pj@engr.sgi.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=kenneth.w.chen@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®