From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: tickle nmi watchdog whilst doing serial writes.
Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 00:07:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050514000723.73bd6e5a.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050514065753.GA28213@redhat.com>
Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 11:43:31PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > This was fun. I inserted a music CD with some obnoxious copy-protection
> > > on it into the drive, and lots of SCSI errors went zipping over to
> > > the serial console. Unfortunatly, the box was also compiling a kernel,
> > > playing oggs, and doing a number of other things at the same time,
> > > so this happened..
> > >
> > > NMI Watchdog detected LOCKUP on CPU2CPU 2
> >
> > OK.. But calling touch_nmi_watchdog() at 1MHz seems a bit excessive, and
> > might perturb the finely-tuned timing in there.
> >
> > How's about this?
>
> Umm.. Despite it being past my bedtime, I'm pretty sure I'm
> missing something here...
>
> > + while (!(serial_in(up, UART_MSR) & UART_MSR_CTS) && --tmout)
> > udelay(1);
>
> I don't see how this is any better than the current code.
> We're doing 1000000 udelays. Whilst we're doing that,
> the nmi watchdog goes bonkers.
>
> > + if (tmout < 1000000)
> > + touch_nmi_watchdog();
>
> So by the time we do this, its already triggered.
But the NMI watchdog won't expire after one second - normally it's set to
fixe seconds.
> How about..
>
> --- linux-2.6.11/drivers/serial/8250.c~ 2005-05-14 02:49:02.000000000 -0400
> +++ linux-2.6.11/drivers/serial/8250.c 2005-05-14 02:54:30.000000000 -0400
> @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@
> #include <linux/serial_core.h>
> #include <linux/serial.h>
> #include <linux/serial_8250.h>
> +#include <linux/nmi.h>
>
> #include <asm/io.h>
> #include <asm/irq.h>
> @@ -2099,8 +2100,15 @@ static inline void wait_for_xmitr(struct
> if (up->port.flags & UPF_CONS_FLOW) {
> tmout = 1000000;
> while (--tmout &&
> - ((serial_in(up, UART_MSR) & UART_MSR_CTS) == 0))
> + ((serial_in(up, UART_MSR) & UART_MSR_CTS) == 0)) {
> + int cnt=0;
> udelay(1);
> + cnt++;
> + if (cnt==100) {
> + touch_nmi_watchdog();
> + cnt=0;
> + }
> + }
<obwhitespacewhine> spose so.
--- 25/drivers/serial/8250.c~tickle-nmi-watchdog-whilst-doing-serial-writes 2005-05-14 00:03:09.000000000 -0700
+++ 25-akpm/drivers/serial/8250.c 2005-05-14 00:06:53.000000000 -0700
@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@
#include <linux/serial_core.h>
#include <linux/serial.h>
#include <linux/serial_8250.h>
+#include <linux/nmi.h>
#include <asm/io.h>
#include <asm/irq.h>
@@ -2098,9 +2099,11 @@ static inline void wait_for_xmitr(struct
/* Wait up to 1s for flow control if necessary */
if (up->port.flags & UPF_CONS_FLOW) {
tmout = 1000000;
- while (--tmout &&
- ((serial_in(up, UART_MSR) & UART_MSR_CTS) == 0))
+ while (!(serial_in(up, UART_MSR) & UART_MSR_CTS) && --tmout) {
udelay(1);
+ if ((tmout % 1000) == 0)
+ touch_nmi_watchdog();
+ }
}
}
_
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-14 7:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-05-13 18:48 Dave Jones
2005-05-13 19:14 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-05-13 19:23 ` Dave Jones
2005-05-13 19:37 ` Russell King
2005-05-14 6:43 ` Andrew Morton
2005-05-14 6:57 ` Dave Jones
2005-05-14 7:07 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2005-05-14 10:31 ` Ed Tomlinson
2005-05-14 10:53 ` Alexander Nyberg
2005-05-15 11:40 ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-14 10:53 ` Ed Tomlinson
2005-05-15 11:38 ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-15 12:07 ` Russell King
2005-05-15 12:20 ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-15 14:01 ` Russell King
2005-05-15 14:03 ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-19 0:24 ` George Anzinger
2005-05-19 7:33 ` Russell King
2005-05-23 20:20 ` Bill Davidsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050514000723.73bd6e5a.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®