From: linux@horizon.com
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Sync option destroys flash!
Date: 14 May 2005 02:43:46 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050514024346.18045.qmail@science.horizon.com> (raw)
Alan the Hirsute spake unto the masses:
> All non-shite quality flash keys have an on media log structured file
> system and will take 100,000+ writes per sector or so. They decent ones
> also map out bad blocks and have spares. The "wear out the same sector"
> stuff is a myth except on ultra-crap devices.
I would have though so, but I can say from personal experience that
SanDisk brand CF cards respond to losing power during a write by producing
a bad sector. I had assumed that a sensible implementation would take
advantage of the out-of-place writing by doing a two-phase commit at
write time, so writes would be atomic.
Does anyone know of a CF manufacturer that *does* guarantee atomic writes?
Obviously, if power is lost during a write, it's not clear whether
I'll get the old or the new contents, but I want one or ther other and
not -EIO.
Given that SanDisk first developed the CompactFlash card, you'd think they'd
be a fairly reputable brand...
next reply other threads:[~2005-05-14 2:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-05-14 2:43 linux [this message]
2005-05-17 13:36 ` Lennart Sorensen
2005-05-17 20:31 ` linux
2005-05-17 20:43 ` Richard B. Johnson
2005-05-18 21:08 ` Sync option destroys flash! Now I'm confused Michael H. Warfield
2005-05-19 12:50 ` Richard B. Johnson
2005-05-18 13:37 ` Sync option destroys flash! Lennart Sorensen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-05-18 11:13 linux
2005-05-18 12:01 ` Richard B. Johnson
[not found] <43UT5-jT-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
2005-05-14 4:34 ` Robert Hancock
[not found] <43Ldl-NM-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <43M9s-1B8-39@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <43MCx-1UF-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <43MVz-2hL-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
2005-05-13 23:59 ` Robert Hancock
2005-05-13 16:20 Michael H. Warfield
2005-05-13 17:17 ` Lennart Sorensen
2005-05-13 17:53 ` Michael H. Warfield
2005-05-13 18:09 ` Lennart Sorensen
2005-05-13 18:21 ` Michael H. Warfield
2005-05-13 18:26 ` Lennart Sorensen
2005-05-13 18:53 ` Michael H. Warfield
2005-05-13 17:58 ` Zan Lynx
2005-05-13 18:13 ` Lennart Sorensen
2005-05-13 18:40 ` Alan Cox
2005-05-13 19:10 ` Michael H. Warfield
2005-05-13 22:00 ` Alan Cox
2005-05-13 22:22 ` Måns Rullgård
2005-05-13 23:24 ` Jon Masters
2005-05-13 23:01 ` Jeffrey Hundstad
2005-05-13 23:27 ` Jon Masters
2005-05-14 10:17 ` Jörn Engel
2005-05-14 1:05 ` Michael H. Warfield
2005-05-17 13:30 ` Lennart Sorensen
2005-05-13 21:25 ` Lee Revell
2005-05-13 22:43 ` Alan Cox
2005-05-15 19:00 ` Denis Vlasenko
2005-05-16 0:23 ` Mark Lord
2005-05-16 9:29 ` David Woodhouse
2005-05-16 16:42 ` Pavel Machek
2005-05-16 13:01 ` Richard B. Johnson
2005-05-16 23:18 ` Helge Hafting
2005-05-18 7:03 ` Denis Vlasenko
2005-05-17 7:59 ` Colin Leroy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050514024346.18045.qmail@science.horizon.com \
--to=linux@horizon.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®