mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* RT and pi_test
@ 2005-06-01 14:13 Daniel Walker
  2005-06-05  9:36 ` Ingo Molnar
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Walker @ 2005-06-01 14:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: mingo; +Cc: linux-kernel


	I've run the pi_test a few times recently with some strange 
numbers. I'm getting abnormally high task latency if I run 
"./test --tasks=10 ./hist" . Depending on how long I run it, I've seen 
task latency as high as 3 milliseconds, should be 0.1ms or less.

The first time I saw these latencies I has the PI abstraction applied, and 
the most recent time I had the attached patch applied only. This patch is 
small so I'm not sure if it could have that type of effect on task 
latency.

btw, 'm not incrementing the RTC priority.

Daniel


Index: linux-2.6.11/include/linux/plist.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.11.orig/include/linux/plist.h	2005-05-27 22:04:12.000000000 +0000
+++ linux-2.6.11/include/linux/plist.h	2005-06-01 13:12:37.000000000 +0000
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ struct plist {
  * @member:     the name of the list_struct within the struct.
  */
 #define plist_entry(ptr, type, member) \
-        container_of(plist_first(ptr), type, member)
+        container_of(ptr, type, member)
 /**
  * plist_for_each  -       iterate over the plist
  * @pos1:        the type * to use as a loop counter.
Index: linux-2.6.11/kernel/rt.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.11.orig/kernel/rt.c	2005-06-01 13:06:21.000000000 +0000
+++ linux-2.6.11/kernel/rt.c	2005-06-01 13:50:08.000000000 +0000
@@ -773,7 +773,7 @@ static inline struct task_struct * pick_
 	 *
 	 * (same-prio RT tasks go FIFO)
 	 */
-	waiter = plist_entry(&lock->wait_list, struct rt_mutex_waiter, list);
+	waiter = plist_entry(plist_first(&lock->wait_list), struct rt_mutex_waiter, list);
 
 	trace_special_pid(waiter->task->pid, waiter->task->prio, 0);
 
@@ -1351,7 +1351,7 @@ static void __up_mutex(struct rt_mutex *
 	 */
 	prio = mutex_getprio(old_owner);
 	if (!plist_empty(&old_owner->pi_waiters)) {
-		w = plist_entry(&old_owner->pi_waiters, struct rt_mutex_waiter, pi_list);
+		w = plist_entry(plist_first(&old_owner->pi_waiters), struct rt_mutex_waiter, pi_list);
 		if (w->task->prio < prio)
 			prio = w->task->prio;
 	}


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: RT and pi_test
  2005-06-01 14:13 RT and pi_test Daniel Walker
@ 2005-06-05  9:36 ` Ingo Molnar
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2005-06-05  9:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Daniel Walker; +Cc: linux-kernel, Thomas Gleixner


* Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com> wrote:

> 	I've run the pi_test a few times recently with some strange 
> numbers. I'm getting abnormally high task latency if I run "./test 
> --tasks=10 ./hist" . Depending on how long I run it, I've seen task 
> latency as high as 3 milliseconds, should be 0.1ms or less.
> 
> The first time I saw these latencies I has the PI abstraction applied, 
> and the most recent time I had the attached patch applied only. This 
> patch is small so I'm not sure if it could have that type of effect on 
> task latency.

this patch now clashes with Thomas' changes. Did you mean me to apply 
this patch, or is it now moot? (The way i read your mail originally what 
that it was describing a problem with latencies, and including a patch 
as the only thing that you had applied. It didnt too inviting to apply
:-| )

	Ingo

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2005-06-05  9:40 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-06-01 14:13 RT and pi_test Daniel Walker
2005-06-05  9:36 ` Ingo Molnar

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®