From: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
To: jgarzik@pobox.com
Cc: gregkh@suse.de, tom.l.nguyen@intel.com,
linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
roland@topspin.com
Subject: Re: pci_enable_msi() for everyone?
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 16:58:19 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050606.165819.74748316.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42A4E213.8050102@pobox.com>
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 19:53:55 -0400
> A technology (MSI) allows one to more efficiently call interrupt
> handlers, with fewer bus reads... and you want to add a test to each
> interrupt handler -- a test which adds several bus reads to the hot path
> of every MSI driver?
I think he's saying something different.
He is saying this test goes in the spot where you select
which interrupt handler to register, in place of the current
logic which call pci_enable_msi() and checks the return value.
MSI unaware drivers are OK because they can only assume
looser semantics (shared interrupts possible, no DMA ordering
guarentees wrt. interrupt delivery etc.) in their interrupt
handlers.
So I guess what Greg is proposing is not a bad idea afterall.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-07 0:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-03 22:45 Greg KH
2005-06-03 23:16 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-06-04 0:01 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-06-04 0:08 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-06-04 0:16 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-06-04 0:34 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-06-04 6:51 ` Greg KH
2005-06-03 23:36 ` Roland Dreier
2005-06-06 22:58 ` Greg KH
2005-06-07 0:23 ` Roland Dreier
2005-06-07 5:19 ` Greg KH
2005-06-04 1:31 ` Grant Grundler
2005-06-04 6:48 ` Greg KH
2005-06-04 7:05 ` Grant Grundler
2005-06-04 7:18 ` Greg KH
2005-06-04 7:23 ` Dave Jones
2005-06-04 14:58 ` Roland Dreier
2005-06-06 23:01 ` Greg KH
2005-06-07 0:26 ` Roland Dreier
2005-06-07 5:22 ` Greg KH
2005-06-07 5:46 ` Adam Belay
2005-06-07 17:43 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-06-05 22:00 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-06-06 23:00 ` Greg KH
2005-06-06 23:56 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-06-05 19:46 ` David S. Miller
2005-06-06 22:55 ` Greg KH
2005-06-06 22:59 ` David S. Miller
2005-06-06 23:09 ` Greg KH
2005-06-06 23:08 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-06-06 23:10 ` David S. Miller
2005-06-06 23:13 ` Greg KH
2005-06-06 23:53 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-06-06 23:56 ` Greg KH
2005-06-06 23:58 ` David S. Miller [this message]
2005-06-07 4:24 ` Grant Grundler
2005-06-07 0:18 ` Roland Dreier
2005-06-07 5:21 ` Greg KH
2005-06-07 22:33 Nguyen, Tom L
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050606.165819.74748316.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
--cc=roland@topspin.com \
--cc=tom.l.nguyen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®