* Why 2.6.11 has 4 number naming convention? @ 2005-06-21 6:50 colin 2005-06-21 8:18 ` David Woodhouse 2005-06-21 8:44 ` Paolo Ornati 0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: colin @ 2005-06-21 6:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel Hi all, Why 2.6.11 has 4 number naming convention? Can you summary it? Regards, Colin ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Why 2.6.11 has 4 number naming convention? 2005-06-21 6:50 Why 2.6.11 has 4 number naming convention? colin @ 2005-06-21 8:18 ` David Woodhouse 2005-06-21 8:44 ` Paolo Ornati 1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: David Woodhouse @ 2005-06-21 8:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: colin; +Cc: linux-kernel On Tue, 2005-06-21 at 14:50 +0800, colin wrote: > Hi all, > Why 2.6.11 has 4 number naming convention? > Can you summary it? http://www.google.com/search?q=2.6.11.1+release -- dwmw2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Why 2.6.11 has 4 number naming convention? 2005-06-21 6:50 Why 2.6.11 has 4 number naming convention? colin 2005-06-21 8:18 ` David Woodhouse @ 2005-06-21 8:44 ` Paolo Ornati 1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Paolo Ornati @ 2005-06-21 8:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: colin; +Cc: linux-kernel On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 14:50:12 +0800 "colin" <colin@realtek.com.tw> wrote: > Hi all, > Why 2.6.11 has 4 number naming convention? > Can you summary it? http://kerneltrap.org/node/4800 http://kerneltrap.org/node/4803 ... -- Paolo Ornati Linux 2.6.12 on x86_64 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-06-21 8:50 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2005-06-21 6:50 Why 2.6.11 has 4 number naming convention? colin 2005-06-21 8:18 ` David Woodhouse 2005-06-21 8:44 ` Paolo Ornati
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®