From: Joseph Pingenot <trelane@digitasaru.net>
To: st3@riseup.net
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: enhanced intel speedstep feature was Re: speedstep-centrino on dothan
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 15:51:17 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050707205117.GB10635@digitasaru.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050707222225.5b3113e0@horst.morte.male>
>Just a latest question: can be p4-clockmod used together with
>speedstep-centrino? If not, would it make any sense to patch
>speedstep-centrino to use this feature too?
I'm a little confused. How is this different from the ACPI CPU throttling
states (/proc/acpi/processor/CPUn/limit to set, throttling to see all
T-states available)?
On my 1.5-year-old Pentium-M, frequency scaling and T-states are different
beasties, and act entirely differently. I'm currently in the process of
rewriting my governor's brain to deal with the two more intelligently.
-Joseph
--
Joseph===============================================trelane@digitasaru.net
Graduate Student in Physics, Freelance Free Software Developer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-07-07 20:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-07-06 9:22 st3
2005-07-06 14:06 ` Dominik Brodowski
2005-07-06 19:45 ` st3
2005-07-06 16:30 ` Pedro Ramalhais
2005-07-06 19:58 ` Bill Davidsen
2005-07-06 21:11 ` Dave Jones
2005-07-06 21:55 ` st3
2005-07-07 20:00 ` enhanced intel speedstep feature was " st3
2005-07-07 20:06 ` Dave Jones
2005-07-07 20:22 ` st3
2005-07-07 20:40 ` Dave Jones
2005-07-07 20:51 ` Joseph Pingenot [this message]
2005-07-07 21:08 ` Dominik Brodowski
2005-07-07 21:34 ` Joseph Pingenot
2005-07-07 21:51 ` Dominik Brodowski
2005-07-07 21:10 ` Dominik Brodowski
2005-07-07 21:22 ` st3
2005-07-07 21:29 ` Dominik Brodowski
2005-07-07 21:59 ` st3
2005-07-08 5:10 ` Dominik Brodowski
2005-07-08 8:58 ` st3
2005-07-08 10:59 ` Nikolay Pelov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050707205117.GB10635@digitasaru.net \
--to=trelane@digitasaru.net \
--cc=cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=st3@riseup.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®