mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
To: st3@riseup.net, Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: enhanced intel speedstep feature was Re: speedstep-centrino on dothan
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 23:08:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050707210823.GA24774@isilmar.linta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050707205117.GB10635@digitasaru.net>

On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 03:51:17PM -0500, Joseph Pingenot wrote:
> >Just a latest question: can be p4-clockmod used together with
> >speedstep-centrino? If not, would it make any sense to patch
> >speedstep-centrino to use this feature too?
> 
> I'm a little confused.  How is this different from the ACPI CPU throttling
>   states (/proc/acpi/processor/CPUn/limit to set, throttling to see all
>   T-states available)?

T-states _tend_ to be utilized using chipset logic, while p4-clockmod is
done in-CPU.

> On my 1.5-year-old Pentium-M, frequency scaling and T-states are different
>   beasties, and act entirely differently.  I'm currently in the process of
>   rewriting my governor's brain to deal with the two more intelligently.

In your case, I would care about throttling. In very most cases it actually
increases energy consumption, as the state being entered is technically the
same to ACPI C2 (IIRC), so it is only "forced" idling and only useful if
"forced" idling is needed to not need active cooling.

	Dominik

  reply	other threads:[~2005-07-07 21:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-07-06  9:22 st3
2005-07-06 14:06 ` Dominik Brodowski
2005-07-06 19:45   ` st3
2005-07-06 16:30 ` Pedro Ramalhais
2005-07-06 19:58 ` Bill Davidsen
2005-07-06 21:11   ` Dave Jones
2005-07-06 21:55     ` st3
2005-07-07 20:00       ` enhanced intel speedstep feature was " st3
2005-07-07 20:06         ` Dave Jones
2005-07-07 20:22           ` st3
2005-07-07 20:40             ` Dave Jones
2005-07-07 20:51             ` Joseph Pingenot
2005-07-07 21:08               ` Dominik Brodowski [this message]
2005-07-07 21:34                 ` Joseph Pingenot
2005-07-07 21:51                   ` Dominik Brodowski
2005-07-07 21:10             ` Dominik Brodowski
2005-07-07 21:22               ` st3
2005-07-07 21:29                 ` Dominik Brodowski
2005-07-07 21:59   ` st3
2005-07-08  5:10     ` Dominik Brodowski
2005-07-08  8:58       ` st3
2005-07-08 10:59     ` Nikolay Pelov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050707210823.GA24774@isilmar.linta.de \
    --to=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
    --cc=cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=st3@riseup.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®