* 2.6.12-RT-V0.7.51-12 and x86-64
@ 2005-07-07 20:06 Alistair John Strachan
2005-07-07 20:14 ` Ingo Molnar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Alistair John Strachan @ 2005-07-07 20:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ingo Molnar; +Cc: linux-kernel
Hi,
Latest patch doesn't compile on non-i386 arches. I found all users of INIT_FS;
need to be audited to INIT_FS(init_fs); like i386; then it compiles fine.
Ingo, could you also respond to my other thread, I uploaded the screenshot you
requested.
--
Cheers,
Alistair.
personal: alistair()devzero!co!uk
university: s0348365()sms!ed!ac!uk
student: CS/CSim Undergraduate
contact: 1F2 55 South Clerk Street,
Edinburgh. EH8 9PP.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.12-RT-V0.7.51-12 and x86-64
2005-07-07 20:06 2.6.12-RT-V0.7.51-12 and x86-64 Alistair John Strachan
@ 2005-07-07 20:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-07-07 20:16 ` Alistair John Strachan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2005-07-07 20:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alistair John Strachan; +Cc: linux-kernel
* Alistair John Strachan <s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk> wrote:
> Latest patch doesn't compile on non-i386 arches. I found all users of
> INIT_FS; need to be audited to INIT_FS(init_fs); like i386; then it
> compiles fine.
thx, i've put this fix into -51-14.
> Ingo, could you also respond to my other thread, I uploaded the
> screenshot you requested.
unfortunately they dont show any other info, other than somewhere a
pagefault happened. I suspect only serial logging would help.
Ingo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.12-RT-V0.7.51-12 and x86-64
2005-07-07 20:14 ` Ingo Molnar
@ 2005-07-07 20:16 ` Alistair John Strachan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Alistair John Strachan @ 2005-07-07 20:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ingo Molnar; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Thursday 07 Jul 2005 21:14, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Alistair John Strachan <s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk> wrote:
> > Latest patch doesn't compile on non-i386 arches. I found all users of
> > INIT_FS; need to be audited to INIT_FS(init_fs); like i386; then it
> > compiles fine.
>
> thx, i've put this fix into -51-14.
>
Looks like this isn't sufficient to make things work. Userspace segfaults
(i.e. anything I pass with init= just screams about a segfault over and
over).
> > Ingo, could you also respond to my other thread, I uploaded the
> > screenshot you requested.
>
> unfortunately they dont show any other info, other than somewhere a
> pagefault happened. I suspect only serial logging would help.
OK, I'll find time to do this later.
--
Cheers,
Alistair.
personal: alistair()devzero!co!uk
university: s0348365()sms!ed!ac!uk
student: CS/CSim Undergraduate
contact: 1F2 55 South Clerk Street,
Edinburgh. EH8 9PP.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-07-07 20:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-07-07 20:06 2.6.12-RT-V0.7.51-12 and x86-64 Alistair John Strachan
2005-07-07 20:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-07-07 20:16 ` Alistair John Strachan
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®