From: Luben Tuikov <luben_tuikov@adaptec.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>, luben_tuikov@adaptec.com
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Jim Houston <jim.houston@ccur.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.12.5 1/2] lib: allow idr to be used in irq context
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 13:40:20 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050821204020.80730.qmail@web51612.mail.yahoo.com> (raw)
--- Luben Tuikov <luben_tuikov@adaptec.com> wrote:
> --- James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com> wrote:
> > However, there is an infrastructure in the block layer called the
> > generic tag infrastructure which was designed precisely for this purpose
> > and which is designed to operate in IRQ context.
>
> James, I'm sure you're well aware that,
> - a request_queue is LU-bound,
> - a SCSI _transport_ (*ANY*) can _only_ address domain devices, but
> _not_ LUs. LUs are *not* seen on the domain.
Another thing very important to mention is that the layering
infrastructure should _not_ be broken, whereby LLDD are required
to use block layer tags.
First, there may not be one to one correspondence accross layers.
Second, a tag on a layer identifies that particular _layer_ object.
It should not be used across layers or across several layers:
Block->Scsi Core->LLDD.
Third, although SCSI task tags are a SAM concept, they are defined
by the protocol in use and generated and assigned by the Initiator
port. The block layer is _not_ an Initiator port. SCSI Core is
also _not_ an Initiator port.
SCSI Core should be impervious to task tags, i.e. to the Q in
I_T_L_Q nexus. The Q is never visible to it.
Luben
next reply other threads:[~2005-08-21 20:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-21 20:40 Luben Tuikov [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-08-16 22:03 Luben Tuikov
2005-08-17 16:01 ` Jim Houston
2005-08-21 8:25 ` Andrew Morton
2005-08-21 15:49 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-08-21 16:06 ` James Bottomley
2005-08-21 17:27 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-08-21 22:03 ` James Bottomley
2005-08-22 0:33 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-08-22 3:15 ` James Bottomley
2005-08-22 3:52 ` Andrew Morton
2005-08-22 14:28 ` James Bottomley
2005-08-22 16:51 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-08-22 21:53 ` James Bottomley
2005-08-22 22:09 ` Andrew Morton
2005-08-23 17:15 ` James Bottomley
2005-08-22 16:33 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-08-22 14:06 ` Luben Tuikov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050821204020.80730.qmail@web51612.mail.yahoo.com \
--to=luben_tuikov@adaptec.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=jim.houston@ccur.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®