From: Luben Tuikov <ltuikov@yahoo.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>, luben_tuikov@adaptec.com
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Jim Houston <jim.houston@ccur.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.12.5 1/2] lib: allow idr to be used in irq context
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 07:06:33 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050822140634.92263.qmail@web51612.mail.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1124640387.5068.2.camel@mulgrave>
--- James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-08-21 at 08:49 -0700, Luben Tuikov wrote:
> > The caller is the aic94xx SAS LLDD. It uses IDR to generate unique
> > task tag for each SCSI task being submitted. It is then used to lookup
> > the task given the task tag, in effect using IDR as a fast lookup table.
> >
> > Yes, I'm also not aware of any other users of IDR from mixed process/IRQ
> > context or for SCSI Task tag purposes.
>
> Just a minute, that's not what idr was designed for. It was really
> designed for enumerations (like disk) presented to the user. That's why
> using it in IRQ context hasn't been considered.
Hi James, how are you?
Is this the only use _you_ could find for a *radix tree*? ;-)
Since of course sd.c uses it just as an enumeration, according to
you this must be the only use? :-)
It was designed as a general purpose id to pointer translation
service, just as the comment in it says.
> However, there is an infrastructure in the block layer called the
> generic tag infrastructure which was designed precisely for this purpose
> and which is designed to operate in IRQ context.
James, I'm sure you're well aware that,
- a request_queue is LU-bound,
- a SCSI _transport_ (*ANY*) can _only_ address domain devices, but
_not_ LUs. LUs are *not* seen on the domain.
See the different associations? Then why are you posting such emails?
Andrew, please apply this patch.
Thanks,
Luben
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-22 21:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-16 22:03 Luben Tuikov
2005-08-17 16:01 ` Jim Houston
2005-08-21 8:25 ` Andrew Morton
2005-08-21 15:49 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-08-21 16:06 ` James Bottomley
2005-08-21 17:27 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-08-21 22:03 ` James Bottomley
2005-08-22 0:33 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-08-22 3:15 ` James Bottomley
2005-08-22 3:52 ` Andrew Morton
2005-08-22 14:28 ` James Bottomley
2005-08-22 16:51 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-08-22 21:53 ` James Bottomley
2005-08-22 22:09 ` Andrew Morton
2005-08-23 17:15 ` James Bottomley
2005-08-22 16:33 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-08-22 14:06 ` Luben Tuikov [this message]
2005-08-21 20:40 Luben Tuikov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050822140634.92263.qmail@web51612.mail.yahoo.com \
--to=ltuikov@yahoo.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=jim.houston@ccur.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luben_tuikov@adaptec.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®