From: moreau francis <francis_moreau2000@yahoo.fr>
To: Andy Isaacson <adi@hexapodia.org>
Cc: "linux-os \(Dick Johnson\)" <linux-os@analogic.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: question on memory barrier
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 09:21:29 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050826072129.71855.qmail@web25802.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050825145445.GD7319@hexapodia.org>
--- Andy Isaacson <adi@hexapodia.org> a écrit :
>
> Did you *read* the post?
>
> # The _only_ acceptable use of "volatile" is basically:
> #
> # - in _code_ (not data structures), where we might mark a place as making
> # a special type of access. For example, in the PCI MMIO read functions,
> # rather than use inline assembly to force the particular access (which
> # would work equally well), we can force the pointer to a volatile type.
>
> That's *exactly* what the writel you quote above does!
OK but he speaks about special type of access, no ordering constraint.
I don't think that MIPS cpu reorder memory access, but gcc can ! And I
don't think that the use of 'volatile' can prevent it to do that.
> To return to the point directly at hand - on MIPS architectures to date,
> simply doing your memory access through a "volatile u32 *" is sufficient
> to ensure that the IO hits the bus (assuming that your pointer points to
> kseg1, not kseg0, or is otherwise uncached), because 'volatile' forces
> gcc to generate a "sw" for each store, and all MIPS so far have been
> designed so that multiple uncached writes to mmio locations do generate
> multiple bus transactions.
ok thanks for this, but once again, there's no ordering constraint garantuee.
>
> I'm not an architect, but I think it would be possible to build a MIPS
> where this was not the case, and require additional contortions from
> users. Such a MIPS would suck to program and would probably fail in the
> marketplace, and there's no compelling benefit to doing so; ergo, I
> would expect "volatile" to continue to be sufficient on MIPS.
>
I hope so...It's hard to find out an answer to such questions (maybe
it's the case only for MIPS arch) although it's an important point.
Thanks.
Francis
___________________________________________________________________________
Appel audio GRATUIT partout dans le monde avec le nouveau Yahoo! Messenger
Téléchargez cette version sur http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-26 7:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-24 12:43 moreau francis
2005-08-24 13:04 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2005-08-24 17:31 ` moreau francis
2005-08-24 18:22 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2005-08-24 19:32 ` Oliver Neukum
2005-08-24 19:47 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2005-08-24 19:55 ` Oliver Neukum
2005-08-24 19:48 ` Andy Isaacson
2005-08-24 19:53 ` Jesse Barnes
2005-08-24 21:45 ` Alan Cox
2005-08-24 21:22 ` Jesse Barnes
2005-08-24 20:03 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2005-08-24 20:21 ` Oliver Neukum
2005-08-25 2:25 ` David Schwartz
2005-08-25 8:49 ` Denis Vlasenko
2005-08-25 9:14 ` moreau francis
2005-08-25 10:07 ` Alan Cox
2005-08-25 14:54 ` Andy Isaacson
2005-08-26 7:21 ` moreau francis [this message]
2005-08-26 10:37 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2005-08-25 10:32 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2005-08-24 21:57 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050826072129.71855.qmail@web25802.mail.ukl.yahoo.com \
--to=francis_moreau2000@yahoo.fr \
--cc=adi@hexapodia.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-os@analogic.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®