mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Lennart Sorensen)
To: Kyle Moffett <mrmacman_g4@mac.com>
Cc: Joe Bob Spamtest <joebob@spamtest.viacore.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Pure 64 bootloaders
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 09:20:45 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050914132045.GS28551@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5A770DA0-A30F-45B1-A47A-2FD21714FA3C@mac.com>

On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 11:44:55PM -0400, Kyle Moffett wrote:
> PowerPC was designed 64-bit from the start too!  It's just that the  
> architecture design group also realized that there would be a demand  
> for 32-bit CPUs, and so from the _64-bit_ system, they designed a 32- 
> bit system whose entire instruction set would be forward-compatible  
> to 64-bit systems when they came out.  That's why 32-bit PowerPC  
> machine code and 64-bit PowerPC machine code are completely identical  
> except that 64-bit CPUs also have a few opcodes to process 64-bit  
> data and a few extra kernel-mode registers.

Hmm, so how does that fit with needing both 32 and 64bit libraries on a
ppc system?  It seems apple forgot the 64bit part of a library recently
in a security fix, or is that something more to do with their os than
the cpu?

Len Sorensen

  reply	other threads:[~2005-09-14 13:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-09-10  7:42 Jim Gifford
2005-09-10  7:52 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-09-10  8:01 ` David S. Miller
2005-09-11 16:33   ` Jim Gifford
2005-09-11 18:48     ` David S. Miller
2005-09-11 18:49     ` David S. Miller
2005-09-10  8:28 ` Andi Kleen
2005-09-10  8:39   ` Jeff Garzik
2005-09-10 16:34     ` Chris Wedgwood
2005-09-10 18:15       ` David S. Miller
2005-09-12 21:32       ` Joe Bob Spamtest
2005-09-12 21:41         ` David S. Miller
2005-09-12 22:02           ` Joe Bob Spamtest
2005-09-12 22:12             ` David S. Miller
2005-09-12 23:09               ` Joe Bob Spamtest
2005-09-13 16:52                 ` Lennart Sorensen
2005-09-13 17:00                   ` Joe Bob Spamtest
2005-09-14  3:44                     ` Kyle Moffett
2005-09-14 13:20                       ` Lennart Sorensen [this message]
2005-09-14 17:26                         ` Kyle Moffett
2005-09-13 17:21                   ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2005-09-13 19:37                     ` Lennart Sorensen
2005-09-14  9:39                       ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2005-09-10 18:30     ` Harald Dunkel
2005-09-12 14:50       ` Roger Heflin
2005-09-13 17:14         ` Bastian Blank
2005-09-15  6:16         ` Harald Dunkel
2005-09-11 11:53   ` Stephen Frost
2005-09-11 14:14     ` Stefan Smietanowski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050914132045.GS28551@csclub.uwaterloo.ca \
    --to=lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca \
    --cc=joebob@spamtest.viacore.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mrmacman_g4@mac.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®