mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@scalex86.org>
Cc: ak@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, discuss@x86-64.org,
	tglx@linutronix.de, torvalds@osdl.org, shai@scalex86.org
Subject: Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 02:50:07 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051017025007.35ae8d0e.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051017093654.GA7652@localhost.localdomain>

Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@scalex86.org> wrote:
>
> On x86_64 NUMA boxes, the revert
> http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=6e3254c4e2927c117044a02acf5f5b56e1373053
> meant that swiotlb gets the IOTLB
> memory from pages over 4G (if mem > 4G), which basically renders swiotlb useless, causing
> breakage with devices not capable of DMA beyond 4G.  2.6.13 was (kinda) not
> broken, although the patch titled "Reverse order of bootmem lists" was
> not in 2.6.13, The reason is commit
> http://kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=6142891a0c0209c91aa4a98f725de0d6e2ed4918
> was not in 2.6.13, PCI_DMA_BUS_IS_PHYS was 1 when no mmu was present, and the block layer did 
> the bouncing, never using swiotlb.  I guess the right fix is to make sure
> swiotlb gets the right memory.  Here is a patch doing that.  Tested on IBM
> x460.  I hope the patch is ok for ia64s too.  I do not have access to ia64
> boxen.
> 

This is an ia64 patch - what point was there in testing it on an x460?

Is something missing here?

>  
> Index: linux-2.6.14-rc4/arch/ia64/lib/swiotlb.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.14-rc4.orig/arch/ia64/lib/swiotlb.c	2005-10-14 00:06:21.000000000 -0700
> +++ linux-2.6.14-rc4/arch/ia64/lib/swiotlb.c	2005-10-17 00:05:22.000000000 -0700
> @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@
>  	/*
>  	 * Get IO TLB memory from the low pages
>  	 */
> -	io_tlb_start = alloc_bootmem_low_pages(io_tlb_nslabs *
> +	io_tlb_start = alloc_bootmem_node(NODE_DATA(0), io_tlb_nslabs *
>  					       (1 << IO_TLB_SHIFT));
>  	if (!io_tlb_start)
>  		panic("Cannot allocate SWIOTLB buffer");

  reply	other threads:[~2005-10-17  9:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-10-17  9:36 Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-10-17  9:50 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2005-10-17  9:53   ` Andi Kleen
2005-10-17 10:54     ` Yasunori Goto
2005-10-17 15:27     ` Linus Torvalds
2005-10-17 15:37       ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-10-17 15:40       ` Andi Kleen
2005-10-17 15:56         ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2005-10-17 16:02           ` Andi Kleen
2005-10-17 18:53             ` [discuss] " Russell King
2005-10-17 16:02         ` Linus Torvalds
2005-10-17 16:26           ` Andi Kleen
2005-10-17 16:42             ` Linus Torvalds
2005-10-17 17:09               ` Andi Kleen
2005-10-17 17:52         ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-10-17 18:08           ` [discuss] " Andi Kleen
2005-10-17 18:27             ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2005-10-17 18:32               ` Andi Kleen
2005-10-17 18:45                 ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2005-10-17 19:04                   ` Linus Torvalds
2005-10-17 19:09                     ` Andi Kleen
2005-10-17 19:15                       ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-10-17 19:47                       ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-10-17 23:50                     ` David Lang
2005-10-18  2:29                     ` Yasunori Goto
2005-10-18  3:20                       ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-10-18  4:28                         ` Yasunori Goto
2005-10-18  6:13                           ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-10-18 10:09                             ` Yasunori Goto
2005-10-18 18:51                               ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-10-19 17:18                   ` Jon Mason
2005-10-20  7:27                     ` Andi Kleen
2005-10-17 18:38             ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-10-17 18:20           ` Christoph Lameter
2005-10-17 19:04             ` Alex Williamson
2005-10-17 19:26               ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-10-17 19:52                 ` Alex Williamson
2005-10-17 15:30     ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-10-17 15:43       ` Andi Kleen
2005-10-17 20:44         ` Andrew Morton
2005-10-17 21:11           ` Linus Torvalds
2005-10-18  0:16             ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-10-18  8:23               ` Andi Kleen
2005-10-18 19:07                 ` [discuss] " Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-10-18 15:48               ` Linus Torvalds
2005-10-18 15:50                 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-10-18 19:54                   ` [discuss] " Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-10-18 21:28                     ` Alex Williamson
2005-10-18 21:53                       ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-10-18 22:04                         ` Alex Williamson
2005-10-18 22:37                           ` Alex Williamson
2005-10-18 23:22                             ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-10-19  1:22                               ` Alex Williamson
2005-10-19  2:02                                 ` Alex Williamson
2005-10-19 12:47                                 ` Yasunori Goto
2005-10-19 14:19                                   ` Alex Williamson
2005-10-19 18:07                                   ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-10-19 20:45                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2005-10-19 22:52                                       ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-10-20  0:51                                         ` Yasunori Goto
2005-10-20  7:45                                   ` Andi Kleen
2005-10-18 22:47                           ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-10-17 10:02   ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2005-10-17 19:07     ` Tony Luck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20051017025007.35ae8d0e.akpm@osdl.org \
    --to=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=discuss@x86-64.org \
    --cc=kiran@scalex86.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shai@scalex86.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome