From: Yasunori Goto <y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@scalex86.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@hp.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, discuss@x86-64.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, shai@scalex86.org, mulix@mulix.org,
jdmason@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [discuss] Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 09:51:02 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051020094011.9A42.Y-GOTO@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051019225218.GA4684@localhost.localdomain>
Thanks a lot for your explanation!
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 01:45:21PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > ...
> > Can you re-post the final version as such, with explanations for the
> > commit messages and the sign-off, and people who have issues with it
> > _please_ speak up asap?
>
> The final version which works for everyone is from Yasunori Goto.
>
> His patch introduces a limit parameter to the core bootmem allocator; This
> new parameter indicates that physical memory allocated by the bootmem allocator
> should be within the requested limit. The patch also introduces
> alloc_bootmem_low_pages_limit(), alloc_bootmem_node_limit,
> alloc_bootmem_low_pages_node_limit apis, but alloc_bootmem_low_pages_limit()
> is the only api used for swiotlb. IMO, instead of introducing xxx_limit apis,
> the existing alloc_bootmem_low_pages() api could instead be changed and made
> to pass right limit to the core allocator. But then that would make the
> patch more intrusive for 2.6.14, as other arches use alloc_bootmem_low_pages().
Yes. I worried a bit that I should replace all of the function or not.
But, its impact is too risky for 2.6.14. So, I wrote the patch to avoid
big impact as much as possible.
> (So maybe that can be done post 2.6.14 if Yasunori-san is OK with that)
Sure!
--
Yasunori Goto
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-20 0:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-17 9:36 Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-10-17 9:50 ` Andrew Morton
2005-10-17 9:53 ` Andi Kleen
2005-10-17 10:54 ` Yasunori Goto
2005-10-17 15:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-10-17 15:37 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-10-17 15:40 ` Andi Kleen
2005-10-17 15:56 ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2005-10-17 16:02 ` Andi Kleen
2005-10-17 18:53 ` [discuss] " Russell King
2005-10-17 16:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-10-17 16:26 ` Andi Kleen
2005-10-17 16:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-10-17 17:09 ` Andi Kleen
2005-10-17 17:52 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-10-17 18:08 ` [discuss] " Andi Kleen
2005-10-17 18:27 ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2005-10-17 18:32 ` Andi Kleen
2005-10-17 18:45 ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2005-10-17 19:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-10-17 19:09 ` Andi Kleen
2005-10-17 19:15 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-10-17 19:47 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-10-17 23:50 ` David Lang
2005-10-18 2:29 ` Yasunori Goto
2005-10-18 3:20 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-10-18 4:28 ` Yasunori Goto
2005-10-18 6:13 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-10-18 10:09 ` Yasunori Goto
2005-10-18 18:51 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-10-19 17:18 ` Jon Mason
2005-10-20 7:27 ` Andi Kleen
2005-10-17 18:38 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-10-17 18:20 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-10-17 19:04 ` Alex Williamson
2005-10-17 19:26 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-10-17 19:52 ` Alex Williamson
2005-10-17 15:30 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-10-17 15:43 ` Andi Kleen
2005-10-17 20:44 ` Andrew Morton
2005-10-17 21:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-10-18 0:16 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-10-18 8:23 ` Andi Kleen
2005-10-18 19:07 ` [discuss] " Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-10-18 15:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-10-18 15:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-10-18 19:54 ` [discuss] " Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-10-18 21:28 ` Alex Williamson
2005-10-18 21:53 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-10-18 22:04 ` Alex Williamson
2005-10-18 22:37 ` Alex Williamson
2005-10-18 23:22 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-10-19 1:22 ` Alex Williamson
2005-10-19 2:02 ` Alex Williamson
2005-10-19 12:47 ` Yasunori Goto
2005-10-19 14:19 ` Alex Williamson
2005-10-19 18:07 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-10-19 20:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-10-19 22:52 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-10-20 0:51 ` Yasunori Goto [this message]
2005-10-20 7:45 ` Andi Kleen
2005-10-18 22:47 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-10-17 10:02 ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2005-10-17 19:07 ` Tony Luck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051020094011.9A42.Y-GOTO@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=alex.williamson@hp.com \
--cc=discuss@x86-64.org \
--cc=jdmason@us.ibm.com \
--cc=kiran@scalex86.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mulix@mulix.org \
--cc=shai@scalex86.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®