From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: zippel@linux-m68k.org, tglx@linutronix.de, george@mvista.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, johnstul@us.ibm.com,
paulmck@us.ibm.com, hch@infradead.org, oleg@tv-sign.ru,
tim.bird@am.sony.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ktimers subsystem 2.6.14-rc2-kt5
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 02:56:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051017025657.0d2d09cc.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051017094153.GA9091@elte.hu>
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
>
> > [...] It will waste my time, I could spend on other projects and it
> > will put Andrew in the unfortunate position to decide, which patch to
> > accept. [...]
>
> yes, please, put Andrew (and me too) into that unfortunate position!
> Please, pretty please, get on with the patches!
I'm with Roman on this one - the old "show me the code" trick which people
use to quash other people's objections is rather poor form - we should simply
address the objections as raised.
That being said, I'll confess that I've largely ignored this discussion in
the hope that things would get sorted out. Seems that this won't be
happening and as Roman's opinions carry weight I do intend to solicit a
(brief!) summary of his objections from him when the patch comes round
again. Sorry.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-17 9:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-28 20:43 tglx
2005-09-28 23:59 ` Frank Sorenson
2005-09-29 0:50 ` Frank Sorenson
2005-09-29 0:56 ` john stultz
2005-09-29 1:05 ` Frank Sorenson
2005-09-29 1:10 ` john stultz
2005-09-29 6:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2005-09-30 15:58 ` Frank Sorenson
2005-09-29 19:57 ` George Anzinger
2005-10-01 1:03 ` Roman Zippel
2005-10-01 11:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-10-04 1:59 ` George Anzinger
2005-10-04 5:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-10-10 12:42 ` Roman Zippel
2005-10-10 14:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-10-01 12:05 ` Thomas Gleixner
2005-10-10 17:22 ` Roman Zippel
2005-10-11 7:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2005-10-12 22:36 ` Roman Zippel
2005-10-12 23:46 ` George Anzinger
2005-10-16 16:34 ` Roman Zippel
2005-10-16 19:26 ` Thomas Gleixner
2005-10-16 23:03 ` Roman Zippel
2005-10-17 7:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-10-17 8:26 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-10-17 9:29 ` Roman Zippel
2005-10-17 9:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-10-17 9:56 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2005-10-17 11:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-10-17 16:25 ` Roman Zippel
2005-10-17 16:49 ` Tim Bird
2005-10-17 17:26 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-10-17 18:49 ` Roman Zippel
2005-10-17 19:19 ` Tim Bird
2005-10-17 19:48 ` Roman Zippel
2005-10-17 20:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-10-17 20:31 ` Roman Zippel
2005-10-18 8:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-10-18 23:52 ` Tim Bird
2005-10-19 0:03 ` George Anzinger
2005-10-19 1:58 ` Roman Zippel
2005-10-19 6:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-10-19 10:49 ` kernel/timer.c design (was: Re: ktimers subsystem) Ingo Molnar
2005-10-19 17:48 ` kernel/timer.c design Tim Bird
2005-10-19 18:00 ` Tim Bird
2005-10-19 19:04 ` Thomas Gleixner
2005-10-19 22:12 ` kernel/timer.c design (was: Re: ktimers subsystem) Roman Zippel
2005-10-19 11:40 ` [PATCH] ktimers subsystem 2.6.14-rc2-kt5 Ingo Molnar
2005-10-19 11:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-10-19 22:24 ` Roman Zippel
2005-10-17 20:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-10-17 20:55 ` Thomas Gleixner
2005-10-18 0:07 ` Roman Zippel
2005-10-18 1:03 ` George Anzinger
2005-10-19 1:26 ` Roman Zippel
2005-10-19 2:52 ` George Anzinger
2005-10-21 16:22 ` Roman Zippel
2005-10-23 18:17 ` George Anzinger
2005-10-27 20:23 ` Roman Zippel
2005-10-28 4:52 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-10-28 16:06 ` Roman Zippel
2005-10-17 16:33 ` Roman Zippel
2005-10-17 16:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-10-17 16:54 ` Roman Zippel
2005-10-17 17:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-10-17 9:54 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-10-04 1:55 ` George Anzinger
2005-10-17 18:38 linux
2005-10-17 19:04 ` Roman Zippel
2005-10-17 22:41 ` linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051017025657.0d2d09cc.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=george@mvista.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
--cc=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tim.bird@am.sony.com \
--cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome