From: Dinakar Guniguntala <dino@in.ibm.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: IO-APIC problem with 2.6.14-rt9
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 02:00:00 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051110203000.GB16301@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051110200205.GA4696@elte.hu>
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 09:02:05PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Dinakar Guniguntala <dino@in.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I get this on boot with 2.6.14-rt9
> >
> > Intel machine check architecture supported.
> > Intel machine check reporting enabled on CPU#3.
> > CPU3: Intel P4/Xeon Extended MCE MSRs (12) available
> > CPU3: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) MP CPU 2.50GHz stepping 05
> > Total of 4 processors activated (11165.69 BogoMIPS).
> > ENABLING IO-APIC IRQs
> > ..TIMER: vector=0x31 pin1=2 pin2=-1
> > ..MP-BIOS bug: 8254 timer not connected to IO-APIC
> > ...trying to set up timer (IRQ0) through the 8259A ... failed.
> > ...trying to set up timer as Virtual Wire IRQ... failed.
> > ...trying to set up timer as ExtINT IRQ... failed :(.
> > Kernel panic - not syncing: IO-APIC + timer doesn't work! Boot with apic=debug and send a report. Then try booting with the
>
> does it help if you edit include/asm-i386/timex.h and change this line:
>
> //#define ARCH_HAS_READ_CURRENT_TIMER 1
>
> to:
>
> #define ARCH_HAS_READ_CURRENT_TIMER 1
>
> ?
It works !! Thanks Ingo for the immediate response
Just a clarification. The comment in the file include/asm-i386/timex.h
says
/*
* On an Athlon64 the cycles-based estimator is off by a
* factor of 2: udelay(100) takes 200 usecs. With the non-TSC
* based estimator the timings are precise. So turn it off.
*/
#define ARCH_HAS_READ_CURRENT_TIMER 1
Does this mean that this is not Athlon specific and needs to be
changed? I have a IBM x255 with Xeon processors
-Dinakar
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-10 20:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-10 20:02 Dinakar Guniguntala
2005-11-10 20:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-11-10 20:30 ` Dinakar Guniguntala [this message]
2005-11-10 20:29 ` john stultz
2005-11-10 20:55 ` Dinakar Guniguntala
2005-11-10 21:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-11-10 21:42 ` john stultz
2005-11-11 7:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-11-11 8:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-11-12 2:25 Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2005-11-12 2:34 ` john stultz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051110203000.GB16301@in.ibm.com \
--to=dino@in.ibm.com \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®